Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26968976›Full record

ArticlePediatric neurology2016

Predictors of Triptan Response in Pediatric Migraine.

Hannah F Johnson, Peter J Goadsby, Amy A Gelfand

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pediatric Episodic Migraine with Aura: A Unique Entity?Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Diagnosis and Treatment of Childhood Migraine.Current treatment options in neurology · 2016
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hannah F JohnsonVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.
Peter J GoadsbyThe Clinical Research Facility, Headache Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, California; The Clinical Research Facility, Headache Group, NIHR-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, King's College London, UK.
Amy A GelfandThe Clinical Research Facility, Headache Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, California; Division of Child Neurology, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, California. Electronic address: Amy.gelfand@ucsf.edu.
University of California, San Francisco · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Clinical and Transtional Science InstituteKL2TR000143 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GRANDIS, JENNIFER RUBIN · 2012 to 2015
$11.9M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000143
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMigraine is common in children and adolescents and can be disabling. Being able to predict which patients will respond to triptans based on their clinical phenotype would be helpful. Adult data suggest cranial autonomic symptoms and aura predict triptan response. This study examined clinical predictors of triptan response in pediatric migraineurs.

methodsThis chart review study included all patients less than 18 years old with migraine who were seen at the University of California, San Francisco Headache Center in 2014. Univariate χ(2) analyses were performed, followed by multivariate logistic regression modeling.

resultsOf 127 pediatric migraineurs, 70 (55%) had chronic migraine and 24 (19%) had aura. The majority (55%) had at least one cranial autonomic symptom. Of 65 with triptan outcome data, 47 (73%) benefitted from a triptan. In univariate analyses, triptan benefit was seen in 65% with chronic migraine versus 88% with episodic migraine (P = 0.048), 67% with aura versus 74% without (P = 0.66), and 70% with cranial autonomic symptom versus 74% without (P = 0.76). In a multivariate logistic regression model, chronic migraine, aura, and cranial autonomic symptom were not statistically significant predictors of triptan benefit: chronic migraine: 0.25 (0.06-1.04); aura: 0.65 (0.09-4.45); cranial autonomic symptom: 0.75 (0.22-2.52).

conclusionsIn univariate analysis, individuals with chronic migraine were less likely to benefit from triptans. In contrast to what has been documented in adults, cranial autonomic symptoms and aura did not predict triptan response, although our small sample size limited the study's power. Larger pediatric studies are needed, and future pediatric triptan trials should provide response rates stratified by clinical variables such as aura.

Indexed as

AdolescentFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMigraine DisordersMultivariate AnalysisPrognosisSerotonin AgentsTreatment OutcomeTryptaminesSerotonin AgentsTryptaminesauracranial autonomic symptomsmigrainepediatricstriptan

Identifiers

PMID26968976
PMCPMC4899237
OpenAlexW2254504184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.