ArticleBMC systems biology2016
Multi-objective optimization framework to obtain model-based guidelines for tuning biological synthetic devices: an adaptive network case.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antimony 3: Extending human-readable model definitions for SBML Level 3 Core and Packages.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Antimony 3: Extending human-readable model definitions for SBML Level 3 Core and Packages.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- GCAD: A Computational Framework for Mammalian Genetic Program Computer-Aided Design.ACS synthetic biology · 2026Article
- Generative design of synthetic gene circuits for functional and evolutionary properties.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- GCAD: a Computational Framework for Mammalian Genetic Program Computer-Aided Design.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- A model-based design strategy to engineer miRNA-regulated detection systems.Frontiers in systems biology · 2025Article
- Synthetic biology design principles enable efficient bioproduction of Heparosan with low molecular weight and low polydispersion index for the biomedical industry.Synthetic biology (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Optimal performance objectives in the highly conserved bone morphogenetic protein signaling pathway.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Article
- Functional Synthetic Biology.Synthetic biology (Oxford, England) · 2023Review
- Modeling and Optimization of a Molecular Biocontroller for the Regulation of Complex Metabolic Pathways.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Article
- Experimental evidence for constraints in amplitude-timescale co-variation of a biomolecular pulse generating circuit design.IET systems biology · 2020Article
- Extended Metabolic Biosensor Design for Dynamic Pathway Regulation of Cell Factories.iScience · 2020Article
- System-level analysis of metabolic trade-offs during anaerobic photoheterotrophic growth in Rhodopseudomonas palustris.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Article
- Designing synthetic networks in silico: a generalised evolutionary algorithm approach.BMC systems biology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundModel based design plays a fundamental role in synthetic biology. Exploiting modularity, i.e. using biological parts and interconnecting them to build new and more complex biological circuits is one of the key issues. In this context, mathematical models have been used to generate predictions of the behavior of the designed device. Designers not only want the ability to predict the circuit behavior once all its components have been determined, but also to help on the design and selection of its biological parts, i.e. to provide guidelines for the experimental implementation. This is tantamount to obtaining proper values of the model parameters, for the circuit behavior results from the interplay between model structure and parameters tuning. However, determining crisp values for parameters of the involved parts is not a realistic approach. Uncertainty is ubiquitous to biology, and the characterization of biological parts is not exempt from it. Moreover, the desired dynamical behavior for the designed circuit usually results from a trade-off among several goals to be optimized.
resultsWe propose the use of a multi-objective optimization tuning framework to get a model-based set of guidelines for the selection of the kinetic parameters required to build a biological device with desired behavior. The design criteria are encoded in the formulation of the objectives and optimization problem itself. As a result, on the one hand the designer obtains qualitative regions/intervals of values of the circuit parameters giving rise to the predefined circuit behavior; on the other hand, he obtains useful information for its guidance in the implementation process. These parameters are chosen so that they can effectively be tuned at the wet-lab, i.e. they are effective biological tuning knobs. To show the proposed approach, the methodology is applied to the design of a well known biological circuit: a genetic incoherent feed-forward circuit showing adaptive behavior.
conclusionThe proposed multi-objective optimization design framework is able to provide effective guidelines to tune biological parameters so as to achieve a desired circuit behavior. Moreover, it is easy to analyze the impact of the context on the synthetic device to be designed. That is, one can analyze how the presence of a downstream load influences the performance of the designed circuit, and take it into account.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.