Observational studyRheumatology international2016
Diagnostic value of progranulin in patients with lupus nephritis and its correlation with disease activity.
Observational study in Rheumatology international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Progranulin mediates the onset of pristane induced systemic lupus erythematosus.Advances in rheumatology (London, England) · 2024Article
- Serum Progranulin Level Might Differentiate Non-IPF ILD from IPF.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Current Insights on Biomarkers in Lupus Nephritis: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Integrated, multicohort analysis reveals unified signature of systemic lupus erythematosus.JCI insight · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to explore whether progranulin (PGRN) can be a useful marker not only for accurate diagnosis of patients with active lupus nephritis (LN), but also for prediction of the disease activity in this population. A total of 154 LN patients were enrolled in this study, 76 of which were diagnosed as having active LN and 78 as having stable LN. Additionally, 71 age-matched non-LN patients were enrolled as controls. The serum and urine PGRN levels of each study population were measured using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method. The diagnostic performance of both indicators and their correlation with the disease activity of LN were systematically investigated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and correlation analysis. The active LN population had significantly higher serum and urine PGRN levels than the other two populations. ROC analysis further demonstrated that these two indicators, particularly in combination, appear to have a strong performance in discriminating active LN patients from the rest of the LN population. In the active LN population, serum and urine PGRN levels were not only significantly correlated with SLEDAI score, rSLEDAI score, and activity index, but also had a considerable association with several key markers reflecting the disease activity of LN, including serum levels of complement component 3 and ds-DNA. Nevertheless, neither of the two indicators were correlated with the pathological classification of LN, chronicity index, serum creatinine level, and 24-h urine protein levels. Our findings demonstrate that PGRN may have great potential as a diagnostic factor for active LN and as a predictor for its disease activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.