Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26968757›Full record

ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2016

A preliminary study for novel use of two Mg alloys (WE43 and Mg3Gd).

Yu Guo, Weiwei Liu, Shanshan Ma, Jia Wang, Jingting Zou, Zhenzhen Liu, Jinghui Zhao, Yanmin Zhou

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Research status and prospects of biodegradable magnesium-based metal guided bone regeneration membranes.Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yu GuoDepartment of Dental Implantology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Ji Lin University, Changchun, People's Republic of China.
Weiwei LiuDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Ji Lin University, Changchun, People's Republic of China.
Shanshan MaDepartment of Dental Implantology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Ji Lin University, Changchun, People's Republic of China.
Jia WangDepartment of Dental Implantology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Ji Lin University, Changchun, People's Republic of China.
Jingting ZouDepartment of Dental Implantology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Ji Lin University, Changchun, People's Republic of China.
Zhenzhen LiuDepartment of Dental Implantology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Ji Lin University, Changchun, People's Republic of China.
Jinghui ZhaoDepartment of Dental Implantology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Ji Lin University, Changchun, People's Republic of China. zhaojh_1986@126.com.
Yanmin ZhouDepartment of Dental Implantology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Ji Lin University, Changchun, People's Republic of China. 2743416623@qq.com.
Stomatology Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, two types of magnesium alloys (WE43 and Mg3Gd) were compared with Heal-All membrane (a biodegradable membrane used in guided bone regeneration) in vitro to determine whether the alloys could be used as biodegradable membranes. Degradation behavior was assessed using immersion testing with simulated body fluid (SBF). Microstructural characteristics before and after immersion were evaluated through scanning electron microscopy, and degradation products were analyzed with energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS). To evaluate the biocompatibility of the three types of materials, we performed cytotoxicity, adhesion, and mineralization tests using human osteoblast-like MG63 cells. Immersion testing results showed no significant difference in degradation rate between WE43 and Mg3Gd alloys. However, both Mg alloys corroded faster than the Heal-All membrane, with pitting corrosion as the main corrosion mode for the alloys. Degradation products mainly included P- and Ca-containing apatites on the surface of WE43 and Mg3Gd, whereas these apatites were rarely detected on the surface of the Heal-All membrane. All three type of materials exhibited good biocompatibility. In the mineralization experiment, the alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity of 10 % Mg3Gd extract was significantly higher than the extracts of the two other materials and the negative control. This study highlighted the potential of these Mg-REE alloys for uses in bone regeneration and further studies and refinements are obviously required.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsAlkaline PhosphataseAlloysCell AdhesionCell DifferentiationCell LineCell ProliferationCell SurvivalHumansMagnesium CompoundsMembranes, ArtificialMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningOsteoblastsStress, MechanicalSurface PropertiesAlkaline PhosphataseAlloysBiocompatible MaterialsMagnesium CompoundsMembranes, Artificial

Identifiers

PMID26968757
OpenAlexW2293620614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.