Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26968638›Full record

ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2017

Disability Rises Gradually for a Cohort of Older Americans.

Lois M Verbrugge, Dustin C Brown, Anna Zajacova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cumulative Inequality at the End of Life?: Racial Disparities in Impairment in the Time Before Death.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Persistent, Consistent, and Extensive: The Trend of Increasing Pain Prevalence in Older Americans.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Rethinking Disability.BMC medicine · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lois M VerbruggePopulation Studies Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. verbrugg@umich.edu.
Dustin C BrownDepartment of Sociology and Social Science Research Center, Mississippi State University.
Anna ZajacovaDepartment of Sociology, University of Wyoming, Laramie.

Funding

Statistical Data EnclaveP30AG012846 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI VICKI A. FREEDMAN · 1999 to 2026
$23.2M
TRAINING IN THE DEMOGRAPHY OF AGINGT32AG000221 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Sarah A. Burgard · 1992 to 2026
$15.3M
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe study changes in average disability over nearly two decades for a large epidemiological cohort of older Americans. As some people exit by mortality, do average disability levels for the living cohort rise rapidly, rise gradually, stay steady, or decline?

methodData are from the Study of Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old (AHEAD) cohort for 1993-2010. Cohort members are aged 70+ in 1993 (mean = 77.5 years), and the survivors are aged 87+ in 2010 (mean = 90.2 years). Personal care disability (activities of daily living), household management disability (instrumental activities of daily living), and physical limitations are studied. We study average disability for the living cohort over time and the disability histories for decedent and survivor groups.

resultsAverage disability rises gradually over time for the living cohort. Earlier decedent groups have higher average disability than later ones. Near death, disability rises sharply for all decedent groups. Longer surviving groups have less average disability, and slower disability increases, than shorter surviving groups. All results are repeated for younger cohort members (baseline age = 70-79 years), older ones (baseline age = 80+ years), women, and men. DISCUSSION: As a cohort ages, average disability among living members increases gradually, signaling behavioral, psychological, and biological fitness in very old persons.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesDisease ProgressionFemaleFrail ElderlyHealth BehaviorHumansLife StyleLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsUnited StatesChangeCohortDisabilityFrailtyOlder Ages

Identifiers

PMID26968638
PMCPMC5156489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.