Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26968520›Full record

Trial reportImplementation science : IS2016

Collaborative approach to Optimise MEdication use for Older people in Nursing homes (COME-ON): study protocol of a cluster controlled trial.

Pauline Anrys, Goedele Strauven, Benoit Boland, Olivia Dalleur, Anja Declercq, Jean-Marie Degryse, Jan De Lepeleire, Séverine Henrard, Valérie Lacour, Steven Simoens and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Implementation science : IS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04142645 (Pilot Study of the OptiMEDs Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04142645 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Study of the OptiMEDs Intervention: a Complex Intervention for Multidisciplinary Medication Review (Including Nurses, Pharmacists, and Physicians) in Nursing Homes, With ICT-support for the Evaluation of the Appropriateness of Prescribing and for Side-effect Monitoring

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity GhentRan2019 to 2020Enrolled148ConditionsMedication Review, Nursing Home Resident, Nursing HomeArmsOptiMEDs
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Interventions to optimise prescribing for older people in care homes].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2020
    Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pauline AnrysLouvain Drug Research Institute, Clinical Pharmacy Research Group, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium. pauline.anrys@uclouvain.be.
Goedele StrauvenDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Benoit BolandCliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Geriatric Medicine, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Olivia DalleurLouvain Drug Research Institute, Clinical Pharmacy Research Group, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Anja DeclercqLUCAS-Centre for Care Research and Consultancy and Faculty of Social Sciences, Centre for Sociological Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jean-Marie DegryseInstitute of Health and Society, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Jan De LepeleireDepartment Public Health and Primary Care, ACHG, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Séverine HenrardInstitute of Health and Society, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Valérie LacourFaculté de pharmacie et des sciences biomédicales, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Steven SimoensDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Niko SpeybroeckInstitute of Health and Society, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Kris VanhaechtInstitute for Healthcare Policy, Department of Public Health, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Anne SpinewineLouvain Drug Research Institute, Clinical Pharmacy Research Group, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Veerle FoulonDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BEUCLouvain · BECliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAgeing has become a worldwide reality and presents new challenges for the health-care system. Research has shown that potentially inappropriate prescribing, both potentially inappropriate medications and potentially prescribing omissions, is highly prevalent in older people, especially in the nursing home setting. The presence of potentially inappropriate medications/potentially prescribing omissions is associated with adverse drug events, hospitalisations, mortality and health-care costs. The Collaborative approach to Optimise MEdication use for Older people in Nursing homes (COME-ON) study aims to evaluate the effect of a complex, multifaceted intervention, including interdisciplinary case conferences, on the appropriateness of prescribing of medicines for older people in Belgian nursing homes. METHODS/

designA multicentre cluster-controlled trial is set up in 63 Belgian nursing homes (30 intervention; 33 control). In each of these nursing homes, 35 residents (≥65 years) are selected for participation. The complex, multifaceted intervention comprises (i) health-care professional education and training, (ii) local concertation (discussion on the appropriate use of at least one medication class at the level of the nursing home) and (iii) repeated interdisciplinary case conferences between general practitioner, nurse and pharmacist to perform medication review for each included nursing home resident. The control group works as usual. The study period lasts 15 months. The primary outcome measures relate to the appropriateness of prescribing and are defined as (1) among residents who had at least one potentially inappropriate medication/potentially prescribing omission at baseline, the proportion of them for whom there is a decrease of at least one of these potentially inappropriate medications/potentially prescribing omissions at the end of study, and (2) among all residents, the proportion of them for whom at least one new potentially inappropriate medication/potentially prescribing omission is present at the end of the study, compared to baseline. The secondary outcome measures include individual components of appropriateness of prescribing, medication use, outcomes of the case conferences, clinical outcomes and costs. A process evaluation (focusing on implementation, causal mechanisms and contextual factors) will be conducted alongside the study. DISCUSSION: The COME-ON study will contribute to a growing body of knowledge concerning the effect of complex interventions on the use of medicines in the nursing home setting, and on factors influencing their effect. The results will inform policymakers on strategies to implement in the near future.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN66138978.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorNursing HomesAgedAged, 80 and overBelgiumCluster AnalysisDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansInappropriate PrescribingInterdisciplinary CommunicationAgedComplex interventionDrug-related problemsInappropriate prescribingInterdisciplinary case conferencesMedication reviewMedication usePatient care teamResidential facilities

Identifiers

PMID26968520
PMCPMC4788941
OpenAlexW2296765245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.