ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2016
Individual exposure of graduate students to PM2.5 and black carbon in Shanghai, China.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of personal exposure to black carbon levels with fixed-site monitoring data and with dispersion modelling and the influence of activity patterns and environment.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2024Article
- Differences in Fine Particle Exposure and Estimated Pulmonary Ventilation Rate with Respect to Work Tasks of Wildland Firefighters at Prescribed Burns: A Repeated Measures Study.Annals of work exposures and health · 2022Article
- Short-term exposure to fine particulate matter and genome-wide DNA methylation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A panel study conducted in Beijing, China.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Adverse effects of short-term personal exposure to fine particulate matter on the lung function of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma: a longitudinal panel study in Beijing, China.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Estimation of the Inhaled Dose of Pollutants in Different Micro-Environments: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Toxics · 2021Review
- Prenatal air pollution exposure and neurodevelopment: A review and blueprint for a harmonized approach within ECHO.Environmental research · 2021Review
- Personal exposure to PMEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Children's microenvironmental exposure to PMJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2020Article
- Spatial and Temporal Dynamics in Air Pollution Exposure Assessment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Review
- The mobile monitoring of black carbon and its association with roadside data in the Chinese megacity of Shanghai.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2017Article
- Long-term ambient particle exposures and blood DNA methylation age: findings from the VA normative aging study.Environmental epigenetics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The personal exposure of 51 graduate students to PM2.5 and BC in Shanghai was evaluated using portable PM2.5 and BC samplers. Global positioning systems and activity diaries were used to evaluate the microenvironments/activities that contributed to the total daily exposure of the participants, as well as to accurately estimate the PM2.5 and BC doses received by each participant. The mean PM2.5 and BC exposure concentrations were 110.0 and 5.3 μg m(-3), respectively. These exposure levels were considered extremely high and comparable to those measured in a busy urban street canyon for 24 h. High daily inhaled doses in terms of both PM2.5 and BC concentrations were measured, obtaining 1062.2 and 45.9 μg day(-1), respectively. Indoor activities significantly contributed to the students' daily dose. Eating contributed the least to PM2.5 and BC exposure, whereas outdoor activities contributed the most. PM2.5 dose intensity from indoor eating slightly exceeded BC dose intensity; conversely, transportation showed higher exposure for BC than PM2.5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26968182What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.