Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26968158›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

De novo transcriptome assembly of the grapevine phylloxera allows identification of genes differentially expressed between leaf- and root-feeding forms.

Claude Rispe, Fabrice Legeai, Daciana Papura, Anthony Bretaudeau, Sylvie Hudaverdian, Gaël Le Trionnaire, Denis Tagu, Julie Jaquiéry, François Delmotte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cuticular Structure Proteomics in the Pea AphidJournal of proteome research · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Claude RispePresent Address: BIOEPAR, INRA, Oniris, La Chantrerie, F-44307, Nantes, France. claude.rispe@oniris-nantes.fr.
Fabrice LegeaiIGEPP, BIPAA, INRA, Campus Beaulieu, Rennes, France.
Daciana PapuraSAVE, INRA, F-33883, Villenave d'Ornon, France.
Anthony BretaudeauIGEPP, BIPAA, INRA, Campus Beaulieu, Rennes, France.
Sylvie HudaverdianIGEPP, INRA, F-35653, Le Rheu cedex, France.
Gaël Le TrionnaireIGEPP, INRA, F-35653, Le Rheu cedex, France.
Denis TaguIGEPP, INRA, F-35653, Le Rheu cedex, France.
Julie JaquiéryIGEPP, INRA, F-35653, Le Rheu cedex, France.
François DelmotteSAVE, INRA, F-33883, Villenave d'Ornon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGrapevine phylloxera, an insect related to true aphids, is a major historic pest of viticulture only controlled through the selection of resistant rootstocks or through quarantine regulations where grapevine is cultivated own-rooted. Transcriptomic data could help understand the bases of its original life-traits, including a striking case of polyphenism, with forms feeding on roots and forms feeding in leaf-galls. Comparisons with true aphids (for which complete genomes have been sequenced) should also allow to link differences in life-traits of the two groups with changes in gene repertoires or shifts in patterns of expression.

resultsWe sequenced transcriptomes of the grapevine phylloxera (Illumina technology), choosing three life-stages (adults on roots or on leaf galls, and eggs) to cover a large catalogue of transcripts, and performed a de novo assembly. This resulted in 105,697 contigs, which were annotated: most contigs had a best blastx hit to the pea aphid (phylogenetically closest complete genome), while very few bacterial hits were recorded (except for Probionibacterium acnes). Coding sequences were predicted from this data set (17,372 sequences), revealing an extremely high AT-bias (at the third codon position). Differential expression (DE) analysis among root-feeding and gall-feeding showed that i) the root-feeding form displayed a much larger number of differentially expressed transcripts ii) root-feeding biased genes were enriched in some categories, for example cuticular proteins and genes associated with cell-cell signaling iii) leaf-galling-biased genes were enriched in genes associated with the nucleus and DNA-replication, suggesting a metabolism more oriented towards fast and active multiplication. We also identified a gene family with a very high expression level (copies totaling nearly 10% of the reads) in the grapevine phylloxera (both in root and leaf galling forms), but usually expressed at very low levels in true aphids (except in sexual oviparous females). These transcripts thus appear to be associated with oviparity.

conclusionsOur study illustrated major intraspecific changes in transcriptome profiles, related with different life-styles (and the feeding on roots versus in leaf-galls). At a different scale, we could also illustrate one major shift in expression levels associated with changes in life-traits that occurred along evolution and that respectively characterize (strictly oviparous) grapevine phylloxera and (mostly viviparous) true aphids.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorTranscriptomeVitisAnimalsContig MappingFemaleGenes, InsectInsectaMultigene FamilyOviparityPhylogenyAphidDaktulosphaira vitifoliaeGallicoleGene duplicationOviparityPolyphenismRadicicoleVitis

Identifiers

PMID26968158
PMCPMC4787006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.