Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26968155›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2016

Long-term trends of suicide by choice of method in Norway: a joinpoint regression analysis of data from 1969 to 2012.

Quirino Puzo, Ping Qin, Lars Mehlum

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Changes over time in means of suicide in Canada: an analysis of mortality data from 1981 to 2018.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Sex-specific and age-specific suicide mortality by method in 58 countries between 2000 and 2015.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Trends in Suicide Mortality in South Africa, 1997 to 2016.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  15. Demographic Risk Factors for Suicide among Youths in The Netherlands.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Trend of years of life lost due to suicide in Iran (2006-2015).International journal of public health · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Quirino PuzoNational Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. quirino.puzo@medisin.uio.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9622-4364
Ping QinNational Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Lars MehlumNational Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
University of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuicide mortality and the rates by specific methods in a population may change over time in response to concurrent changes in relevant factors in society. This study aimed to identify significant changing points in method-specific suicide mortality from 1969 to 2012 in Norway.

methodData on suicide mortality by specific methods and by sex and age were retrieved from the Norwegian Cause-of-Death Register. Long-term trends in age-standardized rates of suicide mortality were analyzed by using joinpoint regression analysis.

resultsThe most frequently used suicide method in the total population was hanging, followed by poisoning and firearms. Men chose suicide by firearms more often than women, whereas poisoning and drowning were more frequently used by women. The joinpoint analysis revealed that the overall trend of suicide mortality significantly changed twice along the period of 1969 to 2012 for both sexes. The male age-standardized suicide rate increased by 3.1% per year until 1989, and decreased by 1.2% per year between 1994 and 2012. Among females the long-term suicide rate increased by 4.0% per year until 1988, decreased by 5.5% through 1995, and then stabilized. Both sexes experienced an upward trend for suicide by hanging during the 44-year observation period, with a particularly significant increase in 15-24 year old males. The most distinct change among men was seen for firearms after 1988 with a significant decrease through 2012 of around 5% per year. For women, significant reductions since 1985-88 were observed for suicide by drowning and poisoning.

conclusionsThe present study demonstrates different time trends for different suicide methods with significant reductions in suicide by firearms, drowning and poisoning after the peak in the suicide rate in the late 1980s. Suicide by means of hanging continuously increased, but did not fully compensate for the reduced use of other methods. This lends some support for the effectiveness of method-specific suicide preventive measures, such as restrictions to the access to firearms, which had been implemented in Norway during the relevant time period.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCause of DeathChoice BehaviorDrowningFemaleFirearmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayPoisoningRegression AnalysisChanging trendsEpidemiologyJoinpoint analysisMethodsSuicide

Identifiers

PMID26968155
PMCPMC4788936
OpenAlexW2294786813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.