Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26967993›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Robot Guided 'Pen Skill' Training in Children with Motor Difficulties.

Katy A Shire, Liam J B Hill, Winona Snapp-Childs, Geoffrey P Bingham, Georgios K Kountouriotis, Sally Barber, Mark Mon-Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katy A ShireSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Liam J B HillSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Winona Snapp-ChildsDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Indiana, United States of America.
Geoffrey P BinghamDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Indiana, United States of America.
Georgios K KountouriotisDepartment of Psychology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Sally BarberBradford Institute of Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Bradford, United Kingdom.
Mark Mon-WilliamsSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor deficits are linked to a range of negative physical, social and academic consequences. Haptic robotic interventions, based on the principles of sensorimotor learning, have been shown previously to help children with motor problems learn new movements. We therefore examined whether the training benefits of a robotic system would generalise to a standardised test of 'pen-skills', assessed using objective kinematic measures [via the Clinical Kinematic Assessment Tool, CKAT]. A counterbalanced, cross-over design was used in a group of 51 children (37 male, aged 5-11 years) with manual control difficulties. Improved performance on a novel task using the robotic device could be attributed to the intervention but there was no evidence of generalisation to any of the CKAT tasks. The robotic system appears to have the potential to support motor learning, with the technology affording numerous advantages. However, the training regime may need to target particular manual skills (e.g. letter formation) in order to obtain clinically significant improvements in specific skills such as handwriting.

Indexed as

HandwritingMotor SkillsRoboticsAge FactorsBiomechanical PhenomenaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMalePsychomotor Performance

Identifiers

PMID26967993
PMCPMC4788189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.