ArticlePLoS computational biology2016
Incomplete Lineage Sorting and Hybridization Statistics for Large-Scale Retroposon Insertion Data.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phlag: scalable detection of genomics regions with unexplained phylogenetic heterogeneity.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Unearthing the secrets of Australia's most enigmatic and cryptic mammal, the marsupial mole.Science advances · 2025Article
- Sirenian genomes illuminate the evolution of fully aquatic species within the mammalian superorder afrotheria.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Quartets enable statistically consistent estimation of cell lineage trees under an unbiased error and missingness model.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2023Article
- Interspecific Comparison of Orthologous Short Interspersed Elements Loci Using Whole-Genome Data.Genes · 2023Article
- Article
- Genomic Signature in Evolutionary Biology: A Review.Biology · 2023Review
- Reunion of Australasian Possums by Shared SINE Insertions.Systematic biology · 2022Article
- Uncovering the enigmatic evolution of bears in greater depth: The hybrid origin of the Asiatic black bear.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Article
- Review
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Recently IntegratedGenes · 2022Article
- Primate phylogenomics uncovers multiple rapid radiations and ancient interspecific introgression.PLoS biology · 2020Article
- The multicomparative 2-n-way genome suite.Genome research · 2020Article
- Reprogramming of Retrotransposon Activity during Speciation of the Genus Citrus.Genome biology and evolution · 2019Article
- Whole-Genome Analyses Resolve the Phylogeny of Flightless Birds (Palaeognathae) in the Presence of an Empirical Anomaly Zone.Systematic biology · 2019Article
- Retrophylogenomics in rorquals indicate large ancestral population sizes and a rapid radiation.Mobile DNA · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ancient retroposon insertions can be used as virtually homoplasy-free markers to reconstruct the phylogenetic history of species. Inherited, orthologous insertions in related species offer reliable signals of a common origin of the given species. One prerequisite for such a phylogenetically informative insertion is that the inserted element was fixed in the ancestral population before speciation; if not, polymorphically inserted elements may lead to random distributions of presence/absence states during speciation and possibly to apparently conflicting reconstructions of their ancestry. Fortunately, such misleading fixed cases are relatively rare but nevertheless, need to be considered. Here, we present novel, comprehensive statistical models applicable for (1) analyzing any pattern of rare genomic changes, (2) testing and differentiating conflicting phylogenetic reconstructions based on rare genomic changes caused by incomplete lineage sorting or/and ancestral hybridization, and (3) differentiating between search strategies involving genome information from one or several lineages. When the new statistics are applied, in non-conflicting cases a minimum of three elements present in both of two species and absent in a third group are considered significant support (p<0.05) for the branching of the third from the other two, if all three of the given species are screened equally for genome or experimental data. Five elements are necessary for significant support (p<0.05) if a diagnostic locus derived from only one of three species is screened, and no conflicting markers are detected. Most potentially conflicting patterns can be evaluated for their significance and ancestral hybridization can be distinguished from incomplete lineage sorting by considering symmetric or asymmetric distribution of rare genomic changes among possible tree configurations. Additionally, we provide an R-application to make the new KKSC insertion significance test available for the scientific community at http://retrogenomics.uni-muenster.de:3838/KKSC_significance_test/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.