Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26967161›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

A Lymph Node Staging System for Gastric Cancer: A Hybrid Type Based on Topographic and Numeric Systems.

Yoon Young Choi, Ji Yeong An, Hitoshi Katai, Yasuyuki Seto, Takeo Fukagawa, Yasuhiro Okumura, Dong Wook Kim, Hyoung-Il Kim, Jae-Ho Cheong, Woo Jin Hyung and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yoon Young ChoiDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University Health System, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ji Yeong AnDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University Health System, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hitoshi KataiGastric Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuyuki SetoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeo FukagawaGastric Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuhiro OkumuraDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Dong Wook KimBiostatistics Collaboration Unit, Yonsei University Health System, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyoung-Il KimDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University Health System, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jae-Ho CheongDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University Health System, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Woo Jin HyungDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University Health System, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sung Hoon NohDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University Health System, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although changing a lymph node staging system from an anatomically based system to a numerically based system in gastric cancer offers better prognostic performance, several problems can arise: it does not offer information on the anatomical extent of disease and cannot represent the extent of lymph node dissection. The purpose of this study was to discover an alternative lymph node staging system for gastric cancer. Data from 6025 patients who underwent gastrectomy for primary gastric cancer between January 2000 and December 2010 were reviewed. The lymph node groups were reclassified into lesser-curvature, greater-curvature, and extra-perigastric groups. Presence of any metastatic lymph node in one group was considered positive. Lymph node groups were further stratified into four (new N0-new N3) according to the number of positive lymph node groups. Survival outcomes with this new N staging were compared with those of the current TNM system. For validation, two centers in Japan (large center, n = 3443; medium center, n = 560) were invited. Even among the same pN stages, the more advanced new N stage showed worse prognosis, indicating that the anatomical extent of metastatic lymph nodes is important. The prognostic performance of the new staging system was as good as that of the current TNM system for overall advanced gastric cancer as well as lymph node-positive gastric cancer (Harrell C-index was 0.799, 0.726, and 0.703 in current TNM and 0.799, 0.727, and 0.703 in new TNM stage). Validation sets supported these outcomes. The new N staging system demonstrated prognostic performance equal to that of the current TNM system and could thus be used as an alternative.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleGastrectomyHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisStomach NeoplasmsSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID26967161
PMCPMC4788413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.