Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26966843›Full record

ArticleJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2016

Implementation and Operational Research: What Happens After a Negative Test for Tuberculosis? Evaluating Adherence to TB Diagnostic Algorithms in South African Primary Health Clinics.

K M McCarthy, A D Grant, V Chihota, S Ginindza, L Mvusi, G J Churchyard, K L Fielding

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The impact of HIV and tuberculosis interventions on South African adult tuberculosis trends, 1990-2019: a mathematical modeling analysis.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Article
  6. TB testing in HIV-positive patients prior to antiretroviral treatment.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Informing Balanced Investment in Services and Health Systems: A Case Study of Priority Setting for Tuberculosis Interventions in South Africa.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Missed opportunities for earlier diagnosis of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis despite access to XpertThe international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

K M McCarthy*The Aurum Institute; Johannesburg, South Africa; †School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; ‡London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom; and §South African National TB Control Programme, National Department of Health, Pretoria, South Africa.
A D Grant
V Chihota
S Ginindza
L Mvusi
G J Churchyard
K L Fielding
Aurum Institute · ZALondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K012126/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND

backgroundDiagnostic tests for tuberculosis (TB) using sputum have suboptimal sensitivity among HIV-positive persons. We assessed health care worker adherence to TB diagnostic algorithms after negative sputum test results.

methodsThe XTEND (Xpert for TB-Evaluating a New Diagnostic) trial compared outcomes among people tested for TB in primary care clinics using Xpert MTB/RIF vs. smear microscopy as the initial test. We analyzed data from XTEND participants who were HIV positive or HIV status unknown, whose initial sputum Xpert MTB/RIF or microscopy result was negative. If chest radiography, sputum culture, or hospital referral took place, the algorithm for TB diagnosis was considered followed. Analysis of intervention (Xpert MTB/RIF) effect on algorithm adherence used methods for cluster-randomized trials with small number of clusters.

resultsAmong 4037 XTEND participants with initial negative test results, 2155 (53%) reported being or testing HIV positive and 540 (14%) had unknown HIV status. Among 2155 HIV-positive participants [684 (32%) male, mean age 37 years (range, 18-79 years)], there was evidence of algorithm adherence among 515 (24%). Adherence was less likely among persons tested initially with Xpert MTB/RIF vs. smear [14% (142/1031) vs. 32% (364/1122), adjusted risk ratio 0.34 (95% CI: 0.17 to 0.65)] and for participants with unknown vs. positive HIV status [59/540 (11%) vs. 507/2155 (24%)].

conclusionsWe observed poorer adherence to TB diagnostic algorithms among HIV-positive persons tested initially with Xpert MTB/RIF vs. microscopy. Poor adherence to TB diagnostic algorithms and incomplete coverage of HIV testing represents a missed opportunity to diagnose TB and HIV, and may contribute to TB mortality.

Indexed as

Nucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesAdolescentAdultAgedAlgorithmsDecision Support TechniquesDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleGuideline AdherenceHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedOperations ResearchSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID26966843
PMCPMC4804742
OpenAlexW2405320739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.