ArticleRMD open2016
Systematic literature review of domains assessed in psoriatic arthritis to inform the update of the psoriatic arthritis core domain set.
Article in RMD open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review finds Core Outcome Set uptake varies widely across different areas of health.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2021Pooled it
- International patient and physician consensus on a psoriatic arthritis core outcome set for clinical trials.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2017Pooled it
- Fatigue numeric rating scale validity, discrimination and responder definition in patients with psoriatic arthritis.RMD open · 2020Trial
- Differential diagnosis between psoriatic arthritis and hand osteoarthritis using indocyanine green-based fluorescence optical imaging.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Enthesitis and Dactylitis Resolution with Risankizumab for Active Psoriatic Arthritis: Integrated Analysis of the Randomized KEEPsAKE 1 and 2 Trials.Dermatology and therapy · 2024Article
- Outcome measures in psoriatic arthritis: Where next?Musculoskeletal care · 2022Review
- Determinants of work and social participation in patients with psoriatic arthritis in the Netherlands: an observational study.BMC rheumatology · 2022Article
- Comparing the Patient-Reported Physical Function Outcome Measures in a Real-Life International Cohort of Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis.Arthritis care & research · 2021Observational
- Ixekizumab for Psoriatic Arthritis: Safety, Efficacy, and Patient Selection.Journal of inflammation research · 2021Review
- Comparison of disease activity measures in early psoriatic arthritis in usual care.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- Patient Preferences Associated with Therapies for Psoriatic Arthritis: A Conjoint Analysis.American health & drug benefits · 2018Article
- Classification and Outcome Measures for Psoriatic Arthritis.Frontiers in medicine · 2018Review
- Updating the Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Core Domain Set: A Report from the PsA Workshop at OMERACT 2016.The Journal of rheumatology · 2017Article
- Important Treatment Outcomes for Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: A Multisite Qualitative Study.The patient · 2017Article
- Defining Outcome Measures for Psoriatic Arthritis: A Report from the GRAPPA-OMERACT Working Group.The Journal of rheumatology · 2017Article
- The Changing Face of Clinical Trials in Psoriatic Arthritis.Current rheumatology reports · 2017Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objectives of this systematic literature review (SLR) were to identify domains and outcome measures used in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) studies in the past 5 years, and to compare the measurement of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) 2006 PsA Core Domain Set in studies published in 2010-2015 vs those published in 2006-2010. We performed a systematic literature search in two databases, PubMed and Embase, to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in PsA. We also identified PsA longitudinal observational studies (LOS). Three patient research partners provided input into study conception, and data collection and interpretation. We identified 41 studies representing 22 unique RCTs, 27 LOS and 12 registries. Across all studies, we identified 24 domains and 169 outcome measures. In addition to the PsA Core Domain Set (6 domains), the following domains were also assessed in more than 30% of RCTs: acute phase reactants, dactylitis, enthesitis, fatigue and work productivity. We identified a range of 1-15 outcome measures per domain with a mean (SD) of 7 (4.7) per domain. The complete PsA Core Domain Set was assessed in 59% of RCTs in 2010-2015 compared to 23.5% RCTs in 2006-2010. There has been increased measurement of the PsA Core Domain Set in RCTs and LOS in the past 5 years. Numerous additional outcomes were also measured. The PsA Core Domain Set needs an update to standardise PsA outcome assessments. This SLR will inform the development of an updated PsA Core Domain Set with patient research partner input.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.