ArticleBMC microbiology2016
Changes of diet and dominant intestinal microbes in farmland frogs.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 129 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Hologenomic rewiring facilitates dietary adaptation to chitin-rich marine resources in the crab-eating frog.Frontiers in zoology · 2026Article
- Connecting habitats, boosting disease resistance: Spatial connectivity enhances amphibian microbiome defenses against fungal pathogen.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Effects of environmental setting and diet on the gut microbial ecology of eastern hellbenders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis alleganiensis).Animal microbiome · 2026Article
- Review
- Comparative Analysis of Environmental and Host-Associated Microbiome inMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Diversity and Composition of Gut Microbiota in Different Developmental Stages of the Tibetan Toad (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Gut microbiomes are largely unchanged when exposed to their amphibian host's latitudinally variable upper thermal limit.Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology · 2025Article
- Research Status and Prospect of Amphibian Symbiotic Microbiota.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Differences in the gut microbiota of the black-faced spoonbill (Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Spatiotemporal differences induced changes in the structure and function of the gut microbiota in an endangered ungulate.Animal microbiome · 2024Article
- From Skin to Gut: Understanding Microbial Diversity in Rana amurensis and R. dybowskii.Current microbiology · 2024Article
- Significant Differences in Intestinal Bacterial Communities of Sympatric Bean Goose, Hooded Crane, and Domestic Goose.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- The Circadian Rhythm of the Behavior and Gut Microbiota in Dybowski's Frogs (Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Are fecal samples an appropriate proxy for amphibian intestinal microbiota?Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Convergence of gut microbiota in myrmecophagous amphibians.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Skin and gut microbiomes of tadpoles vary differently with host and water environment: a short-term experiment using 16S metabarcoding.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Exposure to Roundup and Antibiotics Alters Gut Microbial Communities, Growth, and Behavior inBiology · 2023Article
- The succession of gut microbiota in the concave-eared torrent frog (Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- The fecal bacterial microbiome of the Kuhl's pipistrelle bat (Pipistrellus kuhlii) reflects landscape anthropogenic pressure.Animal microbiome · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAgricultural activities inevitably result in anthropogenic interference with natural habitats. The diet and the gut microbiota of farmland wildlife can be altered due to the changes in food webs within agricultural ecosystems. In this work, we compared the diet and intestinal microbiota of the frog Fejervarya limnocharis in natural and farmland habitats in order to understand how custom farming affects the health of in vivo microbial ecosystems.
resultsThe occurrence, abundance, and the numbers of prey categories of stomach content were significantly different between the frogs inhabiting natural and farmland habitats. In addition, differences in the abundance, species richness, and alpha-diversity of intestinal microbial communities were also statistically significant. The microbial composition, and particularly the composition of dominant microbes living in intestines, indicated that the land use practices might be one of factors affecting the gut microbial community composition. Although the first three dominant microbial phyla Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria found in the intestines of frogs were classified as generalists among habitats, the most dominant gut bacterial phylum Bacteroidetes in natural environments was replaced by the microbial phylum Firmicutes in farmland frogs. Increased intestinal microbial richness of the farmland frogs, which is mostly contributed by numerous microbial species of Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria, and Planctomycetes, not only reflects the possible shifts in microbial community composition through the alteration of external ecosystem, but also indicates the higher risk of invasion by disease-related microbes.
conclusionsThis study indicates that anthropogenic activities, such as the custom farming, have not only affected the food resources of frogs, but also influenced the health and in vivo microbial ecosystem of wildlife.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.