Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26966006›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2016

Changes of diet and dominant intestinal microbes in farmland frogs.

Chun-Wen Chang, Bing-Hong Huang, Si-Min Lin, Chia-Lung Huang, Pei-Chun Liao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Gut microbiomes are largely unchanged when exposed to their amphibian host's latitudinally variable upper thermal limit.Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Research Status and Prospect of Amphibian Symbiotic Microbiota.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Convergence of gut microbiota in myrmecophagous amphibians.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chun-Wen ChangDepartment of Life Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, 11677, Taiwan.
Bing-Hong HuangDepartment of Life Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, 11677, Taiwan.
Si-Min LinDepartment of Life Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, 11677, Taiwan.
Chia-Lung HuangDepartment of Life Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, 11677, Taiwan.
Pei-Chun LiaoDepartment of Life Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, 11677, Taiwan. pcliao@ntnu.edu.tw.
National Taiwan Normal University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAgricultural activities inevitably result in anthropogenic interference with natural habitats. The diet and the gut microbiota of farmland wildlife can be altered due to the changes in food webs within agricultural ecosystems. In this work, we compared the diet and intestinal microbiota of the frog Fejervarya limnocharis in natural and farmland habitats in order to understand how custom farming affects the health of in vivo microbial ecosystems.

resultsThe occurrence, abundance, and the numbers of prey categories of stomach content were significantly different between the frogs inhabiting natural and farmland habitats. In addition, differences in the abundance, species richness, and alpha-diversity of intestinal microbial communities were also statistically significant. The microbial composition, and particularly the composition of dominant microbes living in intestines, indicated that the land use practices might be one of factors affecting the gut microbial community composition. Although the first three dominant microbial phyla Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria found in the intestines of frogs were classified as generalists among habitats, the most dominant gut bacterial phylum Bacteroidetes in natural environments was replaced by the microbial phylum Firmicutes in farmland frogs. Increased intestinal microbial richness of the farmland frogs, which is mostly contributed by numerous microbial species of Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria, and Planctomycetes, not only reflects the possible shifts in microbial community composition through the alteration of external ecosystem, but also indicates the higher risk of invasion by disease-related microbes.

conclusionsThis study indicates that anthropogenic activities, such as the custom farming, have not only affected the food resources of frogs, but also influenced the health and in vivo microbial ecosystem of wildlife.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimal FeedAnimalsAnuraBacteriaEcosystemFemaleIntestinesMalePhylogenyAbundanceCustom farmingDietFejervarya limnocharisGut microbiotaRichness

Identifiers

PMID26966006
PMCPMC4785643
OpenAlexW2293943229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.