Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26965903›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2017

Area-Specific Features of Pyramidal Neurons-a Comparative Study in Mouse and Rhesus Monkey.

Joshua P Gilman, Maria Medalla, Jennifer I Luebke

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Biophysical Modeling of Frontocentral ERP Generation Links Circuit-Level Mechanisms of Action-Stopping to a Behavioral Race Model.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  20. Review

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joshua P GilmanDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Maria MedallaDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Jennifer I LuebkeDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Boston University · US

Funding

Modeling Cellular Determinants of Cognitive Decline in AgingR01AG035071 · NIA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI HOF, PATRICK R, WEAVER, CHRISTINA M · 2010 to 2014
$1.9M
AGE-RELATED CHANGES IN MONKEY CORTICAL PYRAMIDAL CELLSR01AG025062 · NIA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI LUEBKE, JENNIFER I · 2005 to 2009
$1.5M
Physiology and structure of prefrontal projections to memory and motor circuitsR00MH101234 · NIMH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI MEDALLA, MARIA · 2015 to 2017
$736k
Physiology and structure of prefrontal projections to memory and motor circuitsK99MH101234 · NIMH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI MEDALLA, MARIA · 2013 to 2014
$171k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG025062NIA NIH HHS R01 AG035071NIMH NIH HHS K99 MH101234NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH101234
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A principal challenge of systems neuroscience is to understand the unique characteristics of cortical neurons and circuits that enable area- and species-specific sensory encoding, motor function, cognition, and behavior. To address this issue, we compared properties of layer 3 pyramidal neurons in 2 cortical areas that span a broad range of cortical function-primary sensory (V1), to cognitive (frontal)-in the mouse and the rhesus monkey. Hierarchical clustering and discriminant analyses of 15 physiological and 25 morphological variables revealed 2 fundamental principles. First, V1 and frontal neurons are remarkably similar with regard to nearly every property in the mouse, while the opposite is true in the monkey, with V1 and frontal neurons exhibiting significant differences in nearly every property assessed. Second, neurons within visual and frontal areas differ significantly between the mouse and the monkey. Neurons in mouse and monkey V1 are the same size, but differ in nearly every other way; mouse frontal cortical neurons are smaller than those in the monkey and also differ substantially with regard to most other properties. These findings have broad implications for understanding the differential contributions of heterogeneous neuronal types in construction of cortical microcircuitry in diverse brain areas and species.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell SizeCluster AnalysisFrontal LobeImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMacaca mulattaMembrane PotentialsMiceMicroscopy, ConfocalPatch-Clamp TechniquesPyramidal CellsSomatosensory Cortex

Identifiers

PMID26965903
PMCPMC6059164
OpenAlexW2294476253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.