Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26965501›Full record

ArticleMusculoskeletal surgery2016

Survival evaluation of the patients with diabetic major lower-extremity amputations.

Ü Gök, Ö Selek, A Selek, A Güdük, M Ç Güner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Musculoskeletal surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Low Back Pain in Adults With Transfemoral Amputation: A Retrospective Population-Based Study.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
  11. Global Vascular Guidelines on the Management of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery · 2019
    Article
  12. The risk of major cardiovascular events for adults with transfemoral amputation.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ü GökDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, İzmit SEKA State Hospital, 41100, Kocaeli, Turkey. drumitgok@hotmail.com.
Ö SelekDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, School of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey.
A SelekDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, School of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey.
A GüdükDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Rize State Hospital, Rize, Turkey.
M Ç GünerDepartment of Podiatry, School of Medicine, Acıbadem University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the survival after major lower-limb amputation, at a level either below (BKA) or above (AKA) the knee, in diabetic patients.

methodsA total of 140 diabetic patients who underwent major lower-limb amputation during the period of 2001-2011 were enrolled in the study. The patients were grouped as below-knee and above-knee amputations. The differences in survival by age, gender, amputation level and revision surgery were investigated. The clinical follow-up periods and the results of the patients with major lower-limb amputation were retrospectively assessed.

resultsThe mean follow-up period was 24.87 months (range 0.06-120 months). The mortality rate of series was 32.8 % for 1 year and 70 % for 5 years. One-year mortality rate was 24.6 % and 5-year mortality rate was 66.3 % in below-knee group, 1-year mortality rate was 43.3 % and 5-year mortality rate was 83.3 % in above-knee group. The difference between mortality rates of these groups was significant (p: 0.019). There was no statistically significant difference according to age and gender (p: 0.543 and 0.568). The previous minor amputations were found to have no effect on mortality (p: 0.471).

conclusionRoutine utilization of diabetes follow-up, screening and treatment programs with a multidisciplinary approach might be mandatory to handle early multisystem involvement-prevent major amputation, and increase survival rate in diabetic patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort study, Level III.

Indexed as

Amputation, SurgicalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCardiovascular DiseasesCause of DeathComorbidityDebridementDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic FootFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIschemiaKidney DiseasesDiabetic foot amputationFoot ulcersMortalitySurvival analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.