Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26965446›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of surgical oncology2016

The impact and optimal indication of non-curative gastric resection for stage IV advanced gastric cancer diagnosed during surgery: 10 years of experience at a single institute.

Naoya Yamada, Atsushi Akai, Yukihiro Nomura, Nobutaka Tanaka

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of surgical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Analysis of risk factors of stage IV gastric cancer from the SEER database.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Naoya YamadaDepartment of Surgery, Asahi General Hospital, 1326 I, Asahi-shi, Chiba, 289-2511, Japan. yn708@jichi.ac.jp.
Atsushi AkaiDepartment of Surgery, Asahi General Hospital, 1326 I, Asahi-shi, Chiba, 289-2511, Japan.
Yukihiro NomuraDepartment of Surgery, Asahi General Hospital, 1326 I, Asahi-shi, Chiba, 289-2511, Japan.
Nobutaka TanakaDepartment of Surgery, Asahi General Hospital, 1326 I, Asahi-shi, Chiba, 289-2511, Japan.
Asahi Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe survival benefit of non-curative gastric resection for patients with stage IV gastric cancer is still unclear.

methodsOf the patients who underwent open abdominal surgery that was preoperatively intended to be a radical excision procedure for gastric cancer, 72 were diagnosed with stage IV during the operation. At this institution, non-curative gastric resection is performed whenever possible.

resultsNon-curative gastric resection was performed in 44 of the 72 patients. According to the survival analysis, the median survival times in the gastric resection and no-resection groups were 1.9 and 0.9 years, respectively (log-rank test, p = 0.014). Based on the multivariate analysis, we selected gastric resection (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.309; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.152-0.615) and postoperative chemotherapy (HR = 0.136; 95% CI = 0.056-0.353) as independent factors associated with overall survival (OS). In the subgroup analyses of OS, the factors that were associated with gastric resection having no survival benefit were the existence of distant lymph node or liver metastasis (p = 0.527) and the lack of postoperative chemotherapy (p = 0.589).

conclusionsFor patients who have distant lymph node or liver metastasis and those who will not undergo postoperative chemotherapy, non-curative gastric resection has no survival benefit.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastrectomyHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsStomach NeoplasmsSurvival RateNon-curative gastric resectionPostoperative chemotherapyStage IV gastric cancer

Identifiers

PMID26965446
PMCPMC4785630
OpenAlexW2296606941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.