ArticleBMC family practice2016
Collaborating in the context of co-location: a grounded theory study.
Article in BMC family practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feasibility and effectiveness of an interprofessional educational program on perinatal mental health: perspectives of health students in two African countries.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Integrating mental and behavioral health providers into VHA pain management teams and oncology clinics: assessment of early implementation from site visits.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Implementing and Evaluating Interprofessional Education for Dental Students: A Narrative Review.European journal of dentistry · 2025Article
- Foundations of Interprofessional Education in Dental Schools: A Narrative Review.European journal of dentistry · 2025Article
- Development of client-centredness: Perceptions of interprofessional health care students.Canadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD · 2025Article
- Evolving through multiple, co-existing pressures to change: a case study of self-organization in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Primary care occupational, physical, and respiratory therapy role adaptation in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- How co-locating public mental health interventions in community settings impacts mental health and health inequalities: a multi-site realist evaluation.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Healthcare workers' perceptions and experiences of primary healthcare integration: a scoping review of qualitative evidence.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Article
- Healthcare workers' perceptions and experiences of primary healthcare integration: a scoping review of qualitative evidence.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Article
- Scoping review to identify strategies and interventions improving interprofessional collaboration and integration in primary care.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Interprofessional Collaborative Relationship-Building Model in Action in Primary Care: A Secondary Analysis.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2022Article
- Preparing Graduates for Interprofessional Practice in South Africa: The Dissonance Between Learning and Practice.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMost individuals with mental health concerns seek care from their primary care provider, who may lack comfort, knowledge, and time to provide care. Interprofessional collaboration between providers improves access to primary mental health services and increases primary care providers' comfort offering these services. Building and sustaining interprofessional relationships is foundational to collaborative practice in primary care settings. However, little is known about the relationship building process within these collaborative relationships. The purpose of this grounded theory study was to gain a theoretical understanding of the interprofessional collaborative relationship-building process to guide health care providers and leaders as they integrate mental health services into primary care settings.
methodsForty primary and mental health care providers completed a demographic questionnaire and participated in either an individual or group interview. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were reviewed several times and then individually coded. Codes were reviewed and similar codes were collapsed to form categories using using constant comparison. All codes and categories were discussed amongst the researchers and the final categories and core category was agreed upon using constant comparison and consensus.
resultsA four-stage developmental interprofessional collaborative relationship-building model explained the emergent core category of Collaboration in the Context of Co-location. The four stages included 1) Looking for Help, 2) Initiating Co-location, 3) Fitting-in, and 4) Growing Reciprocity. A patient-focus and communication strategies were essential processes throughout the interprofessional collaborative relationship-building process.
conclusionsBuilding interprofessional collaborative relationships amongst health care providers are essential to delivering mental health services in primary care settings. This developmental model describes the process of how these relationships are co-created and supported by the health care region. Furthermore, the model emphasizes that all providers must develop and sustain a patient-focus and communication strategies that are flexible. Applying this model, health care providers can guide the creation and sustainability of primary care interprofessional collaborative relationships. Moreover, this model may guide health care leaders and policy makers as they initiate interprofessional collaborative practice in other health care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.