Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26964861›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

The impact of retractor SPONGE-assisted laparoscopic surgery on duration of hospital stay and postoperative complications in patients with colorectal cancer (SPONGE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Alice M Couwenberg, Maarten J P Burbach, Anke B Smits, Marco Van Vulpen, Wilhemina M U Van Grevenstein, Peter G Noordzij, Helena M Verkooijen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02574013 (The Impact of Use of a Retractor Sponge on Duration of Hospital Stay and Perioperative Complications in Patients With Colorectal Cancer Undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02574013 naunknown statusnot on this map

The Impact of Use of a Retractor Sponge on Duration of Hospital Stay and Perioperative Complications in Patients With Colorectal Cancer Undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: the SPONGE Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt. Antonius HospitalRan2015 to 2020Enrolled188ConditionsColorectal Cancer, SurgeryArmsEndoractor®
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Alice M CouwenbergDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3508 GA, The Netherlands. a.m.couwenberg-2@umcutrecht.nl.
Maarten J P BurbachDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3508 GA, The Netherlands.
Anke B SmitsDepartment of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, Nieuwegein, 3430 EM, The Netherlands.
Marco Van VulpenDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3508 GA, The Netherlands.
Wilhemina M U Van GrevensteinDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3508 GA, The Netherlands.
Peter G NoordzijDepartment of Anesthesiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, Nieuwegein, 3430 EM, The Netherlands.
Helena M VerkooijenImaging Division, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3508 GA, The Netherlands.
University Hospital Heidelberg · DESt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLHeidelberg University · DEUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo achieve an adequate visual working field during laparoscopic colorectal surgery without disturbance of the small intestine, patients are positioned in the Trendelenburg position. This position results in hemodynamic changes that may increase the risk of cardiopulmonary complications and prolonged hospital stay. Recently, an intraoperative retractor sponge was introduced as an alternative to the Trendelenburg position during laparoscopic surgery. The objective of this trial is to study the impact of the use of an intraoperative retractor sponge on the duration of the hospital stay and risk of perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. METHODS/

designThe SPONGE trial is a monocenter study and follows the cohort multiple randomized controlled trial (cmRCT) design. It will be conducted within a multicenter prospective observational cohort of colorectal cancer patients of all stages, for whom longitudinal clinical data and patient-reported outcomes are collected. Patients within the cohort, who will undergo laparoscopic surgery for distal colon or rectal cancer, are eligible for inclusion and form a subcohort. From this subcohort, a 1:1 random sample will be offered to undergo surgery with the use of the retractor sponge. Patients from the subcohort who are not selected will undergo standard treatment, that is, surgery in the Trendelenburg position. The primary endpoint is the duration of the postoperative hospital stay. Secondary outcomes are duration of surgery; intraoperative blood loss and fluid balance; and postoperative body temperature, oxygenation and complications. Both arms require 94 patients. DISCUSSION: This study is the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of sponge-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery in comparison with standard Trendelenburg position on hospital stay and peri- and postoperative complications. Results of this study will also be relevant for other surgical procedures in the pelvic region. The present study is the second randomized controlled trial according to the cmRCT design, which is embedded within our colorectal cancer cohort. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02574013 . Registered 27 September 2015.

Indexed as

Length of StaySurgical SpongesClinical ProtocolsColectomyColorectal NeoplasmsEquipment DesignHead-Down TiltHumansLaparoscopyNetherlandsPatient PositioningPostoperative ComplicationsResearch DesignRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeColorectal cancergastrointestinal surgerylaparoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID26964861
PMCPMC4787008
OpenAlexW2295526245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.