Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26964781›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2016

Best practice strategies to safeguard drug prescribing and drug administration: an anthology of expert views and opinions.

Hanna M Seidling, Marion Stützle, Torsten Hoppe-Tichy, Benoît Allenet, Pierrick Bedouch, Pascal Bonnabry, Jamie J Coleman, Fernando Fernandez-Llimos, Christian Lovis, Maria Jose Rei and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Effects of Guideline-based Computerized Provider Order Entry Systems on the Chemotherapy Order Process: a Systematic Review.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Hanna M SeidlingDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. hanna.seidling@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Marion StützleDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Torsten Hoppe-TichyPharmacy Department, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Benoît AllenetDepartment of Pharmacy, CNRS, TIMC-IMAG UMR 5525, Themas, Grenoble-Alpes University, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Pierrick BedouchDepartment of Pharmacy, CNRS, TIMC-IMAG UMR 5525, Themas, Grenoble-Alpes University, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Pascal BonnabryPharmacy, Geneva University Hospitals (HUG), Geneva, Switzerland.
Jamie J ColemanUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, UK.
Fernando Fernandez-LlimosResearch Institute for Medicines (iMedULisboa), Department of Social Pharmacy, University of Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Christian LovisDivision of Medical Information Sciences, Geneva University Hospitals, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Maria Jose ReiPharmacy Department, Hospital da Luz, Lisbon, Portugal.
Dominic StörzingerPharmacy Department, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Lenka A TaylorPharmacy Department, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sarah K PontefractUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, UK.
Patricia M L A van den BemtDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Heleen van der SijsDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Walter E HaefeliDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEErasmus MC · NLUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEUniversity of Birmingham · GBCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRHospital da Luz · PTUniversity of Geneva · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile evidence on implementation of medication safety strategies is increasing, reasons for selecting and relinquishing distinct strategies and details on implementation are typically not shared in published literature.

objectiveWe aimed to collect and structure expert information resulting from implementing medication safety strategies to provide advice for decision-makers.

settingMedication safety experts with clinical expertise from thirteen hospitals throughout twelve European and North American countries shared their experience in workshop meetings, on-site-visits and remote structured interviews.

methodsWe performed an expert-based, in-depth assessment of implementation of best-practice strategies to improve drug prescribing and drug administration.

main outcome measuresWorkflow, variability and recommended medication safety strategies in drug prescribing and drug administration processes.

resultsAccording to the experts, institutions chose strategies that targeted process steps known to be particularly error-prone in the respective setting. Often, the selection was channeled by local constraints such as the e-health equipment and critically modulated by national context factors. In our study, the experts favored electronic prescribing with clinical decision support and medication reconciliation as most promising interventions. They agreed that self-assessment and introduction of medication safety boards were crucial to satisfy the setting-specific differences and foster successful implementation.

conclusionWhile general evidence for implementation of strategies to improve medication safety exists, successful selection and adaptation of a distinct strategy requires a thorough knowledge of the institute-specific constraints and an ongoing monitoring and adjustment of the implemented measures.

Indexed as

Drug PrescriptionsElectronic PrescribingHumansInternationalityMedication ErrorsMedication ReconciliationPharmacistsProspective StudiesComputerized physician order entryCPOEExpert discussionInpatient careMedication reconciliationMedication safetyQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID26964781
OpenAlexW2296752581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.