Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26964146›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of sports medicine2016

Resistance training reduces systolic blood pressure in metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Ítalo Ribeiro Lemes, Paulo Henrique Ferreira, Stephanie Nogueira Linares, Aryane Flauzino Machado, Carlos Marcelo Pastre, Jayme Netto

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of sports medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
25.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Effects of resistance exercise in prostate cancer patients: a meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Effects of resistance training protocols on nonlinear analysis of heart rate variability in metabolic syndrome.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2018
    Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ítalo Ribeiro LemesDepartment of Physiotherapy, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9245-287X
Paulo Henrique FerreiraFaculty of Health Sciences, Discipline of Physiotherapy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Stephanie Nogueira LinaresDepartment of Physiotherapy, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil.
Aryane Flauzino MachadoDepartment of Physiotherapy, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carlos Marcelo PastreDepartment of Physiotherapy, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jayme NettoDepartment of Physiotherapy, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the effects of resistance training on metabolic syndrome risk factors through comparison with a control group.

designMeta-analysis comparing resistance training interventions with control groups. Two independent reviewers selected the studies and assessed their quality and data. The pooled mean differences between resistance training and the control group were calculated using a fixed-effects model. DATA SOURCES: The MEDLINE, PEDro, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus and The Cochrane Library databases were searched from their earliest records to 10 January 2015. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Randomised controlled trials that compared the effect of resistance training on metabolic syndrome risk factors with a control group were included. All types of resistance training, irrespective of intensity, frequency or duration, were eligible.

resultsOnly systolic blood pressure was significantly reduced, by 4.08 mm Hg (95% CI 1.33 to 6.82; p<0.01), following resistance training. The pooled effect showed a reduction of 0.04 mmol/L (95% CI -0.12, 0.21; p>0.05) for fasting plasma glucose, 0.00 (95% CI -0.05, 0.04; p>0.05) for high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, 0.03 (95% CI -0.14, 0.20; p>0.05) for triglycerides, 1.39 mm Hg (95% CI -0.19, 2.98; p=0.08) for diastolic blood pressure and 1.09 cm (95% CI -0.12, 2.30; p=0.08) for waist circumference. Inconsistency (I

conclusionsResistance training may help reduce systolic blood pressure levels, stroke mortality and mortality from heart disease in people with metabolic syndrome. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015016538.

Indexed as

CardiovascularExercise trainingStrength

Identifiers

PMID26964146
PMCPMC5136729
OpenAlexW2322679062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.