Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26963908›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2016

The Bipolar II Depression Questionnaire: A Self-Report Tool for Detecting Bipolar II Depression.

Chi Ming Leung, Chi Lap Yim, Connie T Y Yan, Cheuk Chi Chan, Yu-Tao Xiang, Arthur D P Mak, Marcella Lei-Yee Fok, Gabor S Ungvari

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Chi Ming LeungDepartment of Psychiatry, Shatin Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Chi Lap YimDepartment of Psychiatry, Shatin Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Connie T Y YanDepartment of Psychiatry, Shatin Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Cheuk Chi ChanDepartment of Psychiatry, Shatin Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yu-Tao XiangUnit of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Macao SAR, China.
Arthur D P MakDepartment of Psychiatry, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Marcella Lei-Yee FokKing's College London, King's Health Partners, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom.
Gabor S UngvariSchool of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Shatin Hospital · CNChinese University of Hong Kong · CNKings Health Partners · GBUniversity of Macau · MOUniversity of Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bipolar II (BP-II) depression is often misdiagnosed as unipolar (UP) depression, resulting in suboptimal treatment. Tools for differentiating between these two types of depression are lacking. This study aimed to develop a simple, self-report screening instrument to help distinguish BP-II depression from UP depressive disorder. A prototype BP-II depression questionnaire (BPIIDQ-P) was constructed following a literature review, panel discussions and a field trial. Consecutively assessed patients with a diagnosis of depressive disorder or BP with depressive episodes completed the BPIIDQ-P at a psychiatric outpatient clinic in Hong Kong between October and December 2013. Data were analyzed using discriminant analysis and logistic regression. Of the 298 subjects recruited, 65 (21.8%) were males and 233 (78.2%) females. There were 112 (37.6%) subjects with BP depression [BP-I = 42 (14.1%), BP-II = 70 (23.5%)] and 182 (62.4%) with UP depression. Based on family history, age at onset, postpartum depression, episodic course, attacks of anxiety, hypersomnia, social phobia and agoraphobia, the 8-item BPIIDQ-8 was constructed. The BPIIDQ-8 differentiated subjects with BP-II from those with UP depression with a sensitivity/specificity of 0.75/0.63 for the whole sample and 0.77/0.72 for a female subgroup with a history of childbirth. The BPIIDQ-8 can differentiate BP-II from UP depression at the secondary care level with satisfactory to good reliability and validity. It has good potential as a screening tool for BP-II depression in primary care settings. Recall bias, the relatively small sample size, and the high proportion of females in the BP-II sample limit the generalization of the results.

Indexed as

Self ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdultAgedBipolar DisorderFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot Projects

Identifiers

PMID26963908
PMCPMC4786156
OpenAlexW2294914366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.