Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26963844›Full record

Trial reportPain2016

A randomized controlled trial of gabapentin for chronic low back pain with and without a radiating component.

J Hampton Atkinson, Mark A Slater, Edmund V Capparelli, Shetal M Patel, Tanya Wolfson, Anthony Gamst, Ian S Abramson, Mark S Wallace, Stephen D Funk, Thomas R Rutledge and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pain, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Anticonvulsants in the treatment of low back pain and lumbar radicular pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2018
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Gabapentin for chronic neuropathic pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J Hampton AtkinsonVA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA.
Mark A SlaterVA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA.
Edmund V CapparelliVA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA.
Shetal M PatelVA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA.
Tanya WolfsonComputational and Applied Statistics Laboratory, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Anthony GamstComputational and Applied Statistics Laboratory, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Ian S AbramsonDepartments of Mathematics.
Mark S WallaceVA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA.
Stephen D FunkVA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA.
Thomas R RutledgeVA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA.
Julie L WetherellVA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA.
Scott C MatthewsVA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA.
Sidney ZisookVA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA.
Steven R GarfinVA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA.
VA San Diego Healthcare System · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Efficacy of Antidepressants in Chronic Back PainI01CX000228 · VA · VA SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI ATKINSON, JOSEPH H · 2009 to 2014
–
CSRD VA I01 CX000228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gabapentin is prescribed for analgesia in chronic low back pain, yet there are no controlled trials supporting this practice. This randomized, 2-arm, 12-week, parallel group study compared gabapentin (forced titration up to 3600 mg daily) with inert placebo. The primary efficacy measure was change in pain intensity from baseline to the last week on treatment measured by the Descriptor Differential Scale; the secondary outcome was disability (Oswestry Disability Index). The intention-to-treat analysis comprised 108 randomized patients with chronic back pain (daily pain for ≥6 months) whose pain did (43%) or did not radiate into the lower extremity. Random effects regression models which did not impute missing scores were used to analyze outcome data. Pain intensity decreased significantly over time (P < 0.0001) with subjects on gabapentin or placebo, reporting reductions of about 30% from baseline, but did not differ significantly between groups (P = 0.423). The same results pertained for disability scores. In responder analyses of those who completed 12 weeks (N = 72), the proportion reporting at least 30% or 50% reduction in pain intensity, or at least "Minimal Improvement" on the Physician Clinical Global Impression of Change did not differ significantly between groups. There were no significant differences in analgesia between participants with radiating (n = 46) and nonradiating (n = 62) pain either within or between treatment arms. There was no significant correlation between gabapentin plasma concentration and pain intensity. Gabapentin appears to be ineffective for analgesia in chronic low back pain with or without a radiating component.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAminesAnalgesicsChronic PainCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsDisability EvaluationDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGabapentingamma-Aminobutyric AcidHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementAminesAnalgesicsCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsGabapentingamma-Aminobutyric Acid

Identifiers

PMID26963844
PMCPMC5001843
OpenAlexW2302708323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.