Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26963761›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2016

Determining clinical practice of expert physiotherapy for patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion: a cross-sectional survey study.

Esther R C Janssen, Elle E M Scheijen, Nico L U van Meeteren, Rob A de Bie, Anton F Lenssen, Paul C Willems, Thomas J Hoogeboom

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A pre-, peri- and postoperative rehabilitation pathway for lumbar fusion surgery (REACT): a nonrandomized controlled clinical trial.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Esther R C JanssenPhysiotherapy Program, Health Faculty, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Elle E M ScheijenPhysiotherapy Program, Health Faculty, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Nico L U van MeeterenDepartment of Epidemiology and Research School Caphri, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Rob A de BieDepartment of Epidemiology and Research School Caphri, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Anton F LenssenPhysiotherapy Program, Health Faculty, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Paul C WillemsDepartment of Orthopaedics and Research School Caphri, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Thomas J HoogeboomRadboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. thomas.hoogeboom@radboudumc.nl.
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLZuyd University of Applied Sciences · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the content of current Dutch expert hospital physiotherapy practice for patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion (LSF), to gain insight into expert-based clinical practice.

methodsAt each hospital where LSF is performed, one expert physiotherapist received an e-mailed questionnaire, about pre- and postoperative physiotherapy and discharge after LSF. The level of uniformity in goals and interventions was graded on a scale from no uniformity (50-60 %) to very strong uniformity (91-100 %).

resultsLSF was performed at 34 of the 67 contacted hospitals. From those 34 hospitals, 28 (82 %) expert physiotherapists completed the survey. Twenty-one percent of the respondents saw patients preoperatively, generally to provide information. Stated postoperative goals and administered interventions focused mainly on performing transfers safely and keeping the patient informed. Outcome measures were scarcely used. There was no uniformity regarding advice on the activities of daily living.

conclusionDutch perioperative expert physiotherapy for patients undergoing LSF is variable and lacks structural outcome assessment. Studies evaluating the effectiveness of best-practice physiotherapy are warranted.

Indexed as

Physical Therapy ModalitiesCross-Sectional StudiesHealth PersonnelHumansMoving and Lifting PatientsPatient Education as TopicSpinal FusionSurveys and QuestionnairesHealth surveysPhysical therapy modalitiesRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID26963761
OpenAlexW2294863540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.