ArticlePloS one2016
Molecular Evolution and Functional Divergence of Trace Amine-Associated Receptors.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structural insights on the ligand selectivity of the mouse trace amine-associated receptor TAAR7e.iScience · 2026Article
- Diving Into the Chemical World of Cetaceans: A Review on the Chemical Senses in Dolphins and Whales.Journal of chemical ecology · 2026Review
- Potential of Small Molecule TAAR-1 Agonists for the Therapy of Neurodegenerative Psychosis: A Medicinal Chemistry Perspective.Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- New Insights into Complex PTSD Treatment: Focus on TAAR1 Agonists.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Natural variability of trace-amine associated receptors in wild meerkats.Frontiers in zoology · 2025Article
- Genome-wide identification, expression analysis of taars (trace amine-associated receptors) and response to cadaverine and putrescine in Mandarin fish (Siniperca chuatsi).BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Chemosensory Receptors in Vertebrates: Structure and Computational Modeling Insights.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- TAAR8 in the Brain: Implications for Dopaminergic Function, Neurogenesis, and Behavior.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Determinants of odorant receptor transcription and gene choice.Chemical senses · 2025Review
- Olfactory GPCRs through the lens of structural bioinformatics.Chemical senses · 2025Review
- TAAR9 knockout increases hippocampal serotonin and alters grooming behavior in rats.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Trace Amine-Associated Receptors' Role in Immune System Functions.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Up-regulation of the Trace Amine Receptor, TAAR-1, in the Prefrontal Cortex of Individuals Affected by Schizophrenia.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2024Article
- Article
- Expanded olfactory system in ray-finned fishes capable of terrestrial exploration.BMC biology · 2023Article
- Evolution of Brain-Expressed Biogenic Amine Receptors into Olfactory Trace Amine-Associated Receptors.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Class A and C GPCR Dimers in Neurodegenerative Diseases.Current neuropharmacology · 2022Review
- Search for Structural Basis of Interactions of Biogenic Amines with Human TAAR1 and TAAR6 Receptors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Review
- Olfactory function in the trace amine-associated receptor family (TAARs) evolved twice independently.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Trace amine-associated receptors (TAARs) are a member of the G-protein-coupled receptor superfamily and are known to be expressed in olfactory sensory neurons. A limited number of molecular evolutionary studies have been done for TAARs so far. To elucidate how lineage-specific evolution contributed to their functional divergence, we examined 30 metazoan genomes. In total, 493 TAAR gene candidates (including 84 pseudogenes) were identified from 26 vertebrate genomes. TAARs were not identified from non-vertebrate genomes. An ancestral-type TAAR-like gene appeared to have emerged in lamprey. We found four therian-specific TAAR subfamilies (one eutherian-specific and three metatherian-specific) in addition to previously known nine subfamilies. Many species-specific TAAR gene duplications and losses contributed to a large variation of TAAR gene numbers among mammals, ranging from 0 in dolphin to 26 in flying fox. TAARs are classified into two groups based on binding preferences for primary or tertiary amines as well as their sequence similarities. Primary amine-detecting TAARs (TAAR1-4) have emerged earlier, generally have single-copy orthologs (very few duplication or loss), and have evolved under strong functional constraints. In contrast, tertiary amine-detecting TAARs (TAAR5-9) have emerged more recently and the majority of them experienced higher rates of gene duplications. Protein members that belong to the tertiary amine-detecting TAAR group also showed the patterns of positive selection especially in the area surrounding the ligand-binding pocket, which could have affected ligand-binding activities and specificities. Expansions of the tertiary amine-detecting TAAR gene family may have played important roles in terrestrial adaptations of therian mammals. Molecular evolution of the TAAR gene family appears to be governed by a complex, species-specific, interplay between environmental and evolutionary factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.