Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26963630›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2016

Using Raman spectroscopy to characterize biological materials.

Holly J Butler, Lorna Ashton, Benjamin Bird, Gianfelice Cinque, Kelly Curtis, Jennifer Dorney, Karen Esmonde-White, Nigel J Fullwood, Benjamin Gardner, Pierre L Martin-Hirsch and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 424 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
424citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
151.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

424 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1,207 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

364 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Holly J ButlerLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Lorna AshtonDepartment of Chemistry, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Benjamin BirdDaylight Solutions, San Diego, California, USA.
Gianfelice CinqueDiamond Light Source, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Chilton, Oxfordshire, UK.
Kelly CurtisDepartment of Biomedical Physics, Physics and Astronomy, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Jennifer DorneyDepartment of Biomedical Physics, Physics and Astronomy, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Karen Esmonde-WhiteDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Nigel J FullwoodDepartment of Biomedical and Life Sciences, School of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Benjamin GardnerDepartment of Biomedical Physics, Physics and Astronomy, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Pierre L Martin-HirschLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Michael J WalshDepartment of Pathology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Martin R McAinshLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Nicholas StoneBiophotonics Research Unit, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, UK.
Francis L MartinLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Lancaster University · GBUniversity of Exeter · GBDiamond Light Source · GBGloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBInLight Solutions (United States) · USUniversity of Central Lancashire · GBUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Regional Pilot And Feasibility Study Grants ProgramP30DK020572 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Mehboob A Hussain · 2013 to 2026
$24.3M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilDepartment of Health II-LB-0315-20008NIDDK NIH HHS 2P30 DK020572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Raman spectroscopy can be used to measure the chemical composition of a sample, which can in turn be used to extract biological information. Many materials have characteristic Raman spectra, which means that Raman spectroscopy has proven to be an effective analytical approach in geology, semiconductor, materials and polymer science fields. The application of Raman spectroscopy and microscopy within biology is rapidly increasing because it can provide chemical and compositional information, but it does not typically suffer from interference from water molecules. Analysis does not conventionally require extensive sample preparation; biochemical and structural information can usually be obtained without labeling. In this protocol, we aim to standardize and bring together multiple experimental approaches from key leaders in the field for obtaining Raman spectra using a microspectrometer. As examples of the range of biological samples that can be analyzed, we provide instructions for acquiring Raman spectra, maps and images for fresh plant tissue, formalin-fixed and fresh frozen mammalian tissue, fixed cells and biofluids. We explore a robust approach for sample preparation, instrumentation, acquisition parameters and data processing. By using this approach, we expect that a typical Raman experiment can be performed by a nonspecialist user to generate high-quality data for biological materials analysis.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsData CollectionElectronic Data ProcessingMammalsPlantsSpecimen HandlingSpectrum Analysis, RamanBiocompatible Materials

Identifiers

PMID26963630
OpenAlexW2295097024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.