Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26963496›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2016

Electrophoretic Separation of Single Particles Using Nanoscale Thermoplastic Columns.

Kumuditha M Weerakoon-Ratnayake, Franklin I Uba, Nyoté J Oliver-Calixte, Steven A Soper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kumuditha M Weerakoon-RatnayakeDepartment of Chemistry, Louisiana State University , Baton Rouge, Lousiana 70803, United States.
Franklin I UbaDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States.
Nyoté J Oliver-CalixteDepartment of Chemistry, Louisiana State University , Baton Rouge, Lousiana 70803, United States.
Steven A SoperDepartment of Chemistry, Louisiana State University , Baton Rouge, Lousiana 70803, United States.

Funding

Bio-MicroElectroMechanical Systems Resource CenterP41EB002503 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI TONER, MEHMET · 2004 to 2018
$17.4M
Single-Molecule Processing: Detection and Identification of Single DNAs, RNAs, and Proteins using Immobilized Nanoscale Enzymatic Reactors (INERs) and Nanoscale ElectrophoresisP41EB020594 · NIBIB · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Steven Allan Soper · 2015 to 2026
$15.2M
Polymer-Based Modular Systems with Nanosensors for DNA/RNA SequencingR21HG006278 · NHGRI · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV A&M COL BATON ROUGE · PI SOPER, STEVEN ALLAN · 2011 to 2012
$616k
NHGRI NIH HHS R21 HG006278NHGRI NIH HHS R21HG006278NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB002503NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB020594NIBIB NIH HHS P41-EB020594
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phenomena associated with microscale electrophoresis separations cannot, in many cases, be applied to the nanoscale. Thus, understanding the electrophoretic characteristics associated with the nanoscale will help formulate relevant strategies that can optimize the performance of separations carried out on columns with at least one dimension below 150 nm. Electric double layer (EDL) overlap, diffusion, and adsorption/desorption properties and/or dielectrophoretic effects giving rise to stick/slip motion are some of the processes that can play a role in determining the efficiency of nanoscale electrophoretic separations. We investigated the performance characteristics of electrophoretic separations carried out in nanoslits fabricated in poly(methyl methacrylate), PMMA, devices. Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) were used as the model system with tracking of their transport via dark field microscopy and localized surface plasmon resonance. AgNPs capped with citrate groups and the negatively charged PMMA walls (induced by O2 plasma modification of the nanoslit walls) enabled separations that were not apparent when these particles were electrophoresed in microscale columns. The separation of AgNPs based on their size without the need for buffer additives using PMMA nanoslit devices is demonstrated herein. Operational parameters such as the electric field strength, nanoslit dimensions, and buffer composition were evaluated as to their effects on the electrophoretic performance, both in terms of efficiency (plate numbers) and resolution. Electrophoretic separations performed at high electric field strengths (>200 V/cm) resulted in higher plate numbers compared to lower fields due to the absence of stick/slip motion at the higher electric field strengths. Indeed, 60 nm AgNPs could be separated from 100 nm particles in free solution using nanoscale electrophoresis with 100 μm long columns.

Indexed as

Polymethyl MethacrylateTemperatureAdsorptionElectrophoresisMetal NanoparticlesParticle SizeSilverSurface Plasmon ResonanceSurface PropertiesPolymethyl MethacrylateSilver

Identifiers

PMID26963496
PMCPMC5555359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.