Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26963392›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Investigation of Adaptive Optics Imaging Biomarkers for Detecting Pathological Changes of the Cone Mosaic in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.

Marco Lombardo, Mariacristina Parravano, Sebastiano Serrao, Lucia Ziccardi, Daniela Giannini, Giuseppe Lombardo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Citicoline and Vitamin BAdvances in therapy · 2020
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. How early can we detect diabetic retinopathy? A narrative review of imaging tools for structural assessment of the retina.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Diabetic macular ischaemia- a new therapeutic target?Progress in retinal and eye research · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Cone Photoreceptors in Diabetic Patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Looking Ahead: Visual and Anatomical Endpoints in Future Trials of Diabetic Macular Ischemia.Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marco LombardoFondazione G.B. Bietti IRCCS, Via Livenza 3, 00198, Rome, Italy.
Mariacristina ParravanoFondazione G.B. Bietti IRCCS, Via Livenza 3, 00198, Rome, Italy.
Sebastiano SerraoFondazione G.B. Bietti IRCCS, Via Livenza 3, 00198, Rome, Italy.
Lucia ZiccardiFondazione G.B. Bietti IRCCS, Via Livenza 3, 00198, Rome, Italy.
Daniela GianniniFondazione G.B. Bietti IRCCS, Via Livenza 3, 00198, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe LombardoConsiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto per i Processi Chimico-Fisici (CNR-IPCF), Viale Stagno D'Alcontres 37, 98158, Messina, Italy.
Fondazione G.B. Bietti · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITVision Engineering (Italy) · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate a set of adaptive optics (AO) imaging biomarkers for the assessment of changes of the cone mosaic spatial arrangement in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1).

methods16 patients with ≥20/20 visual acuity and a diagnosis of DM1 in the past 8 years to 37 years and 20 age-matched healthy volunteers were recruited in this study. Cone density, cone spacing and Voronoi diagrams were calculated on 160x160 μm images of the cone mosaic acquired with an AO flood illumination retinal camera at 1.5 degrees eccentricity from the fovea along all retinal meridians. From the cone spacing measures and Voronoi diagrams, the linear dispersion index (LDi) and the heterogeneity packing index (HPi) were computed respectively. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to discriminate DM1 patients without diabetic retinopathy from controls using the cone metrics as predictors.

resultsOf the 16 DM1 patients, eight had no signs of diabetic retinopathy (noDR) and eight had mild nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) on fundoscopy. On average, cone density, LDi and HPi values were significantly different (P<0.05) between noDR or NPDR eyes and controls, with these differences increasing with duration of diabetes. However, each cone metric alone was not sufficiently sensitive to discriminate entirely between membership of noDR cases and controls. The complementary use of all the three cone metrics in the logistic regression model gained 100% accuracy to identify noDR cases with respect to controls.

conclusionThe present set of AO imaging biomarkers identified reliably abnormalities in the spatial arrangement of the parafoveal cones in DM1 patients, even when no signs of diabetic retinopathy were seen on fundoscopy.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBiomarkersChildDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetic RetinopathyFemaleHumansMaleOptical ImagingRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID26963392
PMCPMC4786294
OpenAlexW2296397168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.