Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26963251›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2016

Investigating Sources of Heterogeneity in Randomized Controlled Trials of the Effects of Pharmacist Interventions on Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Patricia Melo Aguiar, Giselle de Carvalho Brito, Tácio de Mendonça Lima, Ana Patrícia Alves Lima Santos, Divaldo Pereira Lyra, Sílvia Storpirtis

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Revolutionizing type 2 diabetes management: the role of the pharmacist in unlocking the potential of tirzepatide.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Analysis of factors affecting pharmacists' ability to identify and solve problems.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Role of pharmacist during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review.Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Patricia Melo AguiarDepartment of Pharmacy, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Giselle de Carvalho BritoDepartment of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil.
Tácio de Mendonça LimaDepartment of Pharmacy, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Patrícia Alves Lima SantosDepartment of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil.
Divaldo Pereira LyraDepartment of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil.
Sílvia StorpirtisDepartment of Pharmacy, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de Sergipe · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the effect of pharmacist interventions on glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients and to examine factors that could explain the variation across studies.

methodsA comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and LILACS databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to July 2015. The search strategy included the use of MeSH terms or text words related to pharmacist interventions, type 2 diabetes, and randomized controlled trials. RCTs published in English, Portuguese, or Spanish that evaluated the effect of pharmacist intervention on glycemic control in type 2 diabetic outpatients were included. Two independent authors executed study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Mean differences in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were estimated using random-effect models, and heterogeneity was evaluated by subgroup and meta-regression analyses.

resultsThe literature search yielded 963 records of potential interest, of which 30 were included in the systematic review and 22 in the meta-analysis. Most of these RCTs were conducted in the United States in patients in outpatient clinics using face-to-face contact only. All RCTs performed patient education, and most executed the medication review. The appraised sample showed uncertain or high risk of bias in most of the items evaluated, resulting in low-quality studies. In comparison with usual care, pharmacist interventions were associated with significant reductions in HbA1c levels (-8.5% [95% CI: -1.06, -0.65]; P < 0.0001; I2 = 67.3%). Subgroup analysis indicated differences of heterogeneity by country, baseline HbA1c levels, setting, intervention frequency, and random allocation. Age and HbA1c levels partly explained the variability across studies by meta-regression.

conclusionsOur findings confirmed that pharmacist interventions improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes compared with usual care and suggest that younger patients or with higher baseline HbA1c levels may be the main beneficiaries of pharmacist care. PROTOCOL PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42014007457.

Indexed as

Age FactorsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansMalePubMedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, human

Identifiers

PMID26963251
PMCPMC4786227
OpenAlexW2296758023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.