Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2016
Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole versus Placebo for Uncomplicated Skin Abscess.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 63 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Strategies Using Off-Patent Antibiotics for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ("STOP MRSA") - A Phase IIB, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial
Study Protocol for A Randomized Controlled Trial of Incision and Drainage Versus Ultrasound-Guided Needle Aspiration for Uncomplicated Skin Abscesses
Who cites it
63 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 224 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incision and drainage of cutaneous abscess with or without cavity packing: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Antibiotics for uncomplicated skin abscesses: systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2018Pooled it
- Subgroup Analysis of Antibiotic Treatment for Skin Abscesses.Annals of emergency medicine · 2018Trial
- Trial
- A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Antibiotics for Smaller Skin Abscesses.The New England journal of medicine · 2017Trial
- Trial
- A Randomized Trial of Clindamycin Versus Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for Uncomplicated Wound Infection.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016Trial
- Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026Review
- Article
- Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection of the temple region of the face: Case report.Medicine · 2025Article
- Phenotypic and genotypic correlates of the sodium bicarbonate-responsive phenotype among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from skin and soft-tissue infections.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2025Article
- Device Evaluation, Treatment, and Explantation Recommendations (DETER): Review and Best Practices for Managing Neuromodulation Device Infections.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- Secondary Bacterial Infections in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis or Other Common Dermatoses.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2024Review
- Review
- Treatment of MRSA Infection: Where are We?Current medicinal chemistry · 2024Review
- Case report: A rare case of skin abscess caused by coinfection ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Article
- New Perianal Sepsis Risk Score Predicts Outcome of Elderly Patients with Perianal Abscesses.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- [Diagnosis and therapy of granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis-2023: consensus of the Austrian society of nephrology (ÖGN) and Austrian society of rheumatology (ÖGR)].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2023Article
- Clinical Impact ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Insufficient Representation of Patients With Obesity in Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Antimicrobials for Treatment of Skin and Skin Structure Infections: A Scoping Review.Open forum infectious diseases · 2023Article
3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundU.S. emergency department visits for cutaneous abscess have increased with the emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The role of antibiotics for patients with a drained abscess is unclear.
methodsWe conducted a randomized trial at five U.S. emergency departments to determine whether trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (at doses of 320 mg and 1600 mg, respectively, twice daily, for 7 days) would be superior to placebo in outpatients older than 12 years of age who had an uncomplicated abscess that was being treated with drainage. The primary outcome was clinical cure of the abscess, assessed 7 to 14 days after the end of the treatment period.
resultsThe median age of the participants was 35 years (range, 14 to 73); 45.3% of the participants had wound cultures that were positive for MRSA. In the modified intention-to-treat population, clinical cure of the abscess occurred in 507 of 630 participants (80.5%) in the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole group versus 454 of 617 participants (73.6%) in the placebo group (difference, 6.9 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1 to 11.7; P=0.005). In the per-protocol population, clinical cure occurred in 487 of 524 participants (92.9%) in the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole group versus 457 of 533 participants (85.7%) in the placebo group (difference, 7.2 percentage points; 95% CI, 3.2 to 11.2; P<0.001). Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was superior to placebo with respect to most secondary outcomes in the per-protocol population, resulting in lower rates of subsequent surgical drainage procedures (3.4% vs. 8.6%; difference, -5.2 percentage points; 95% CI, -8.2 to -2.2), skin infections at new sites (3.1% vs. 10.3%; difference, -7.2 percentage points; 95% CI, -10.4 to -4.1), and infections in household members (1.7% vs. 4.1%; difference, -2.4 percentage points; 95% CI, -4.6 to -0.2) 7 to 14 days after the treatment period. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was associated with slightly more gastrointestinal side effects (mostly mild) than placebo. At 7 to 14 days after the treatment period, invasive infections had developed in 2 of 524 participants (0.4%) in the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole group and in 2 of 533 participants (0.4%) in the placebo group; at 42 to 56 days after the treatment period, an invasive infection had developed in 1 participant (0.2%) in the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole group.
conclusionsIn settings in which MRSA was prevalent, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole treatment resulted in a higher cure rate among patients with a drained cutaneous abscess than placebo. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00729937.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.