SynthesisMedicine2016
Distal Pancreatectomy With En Bloc Celiac Axis Resection for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of contemporary pancreas surgery with arterial resection.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2020Pooled it
- Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for pancreatic cancer: a pooled analysis of 109 cases.Updates in surgery · 2020Pooled it
- Distal and Total Pancreatectomy With En Bloc Celiac Axis Resection for Pancreatic Cancer at a High-Volume Center.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026Article
- Real-world short-term outcomes after distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection using the National clinical database of Japan.Surgery today · 2026Article
- Surgery and neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: an umbrella review of survival, resection outcomes, and cost-effectiveness.Gland surgery · 2025Review
- Review
- Article
- Aorta to proper hepatic artery bypass with total pancreatectomy and celiac axis resection (TP-CAR) in a patient with locally advanced pancreas adenocarcinoma.International journal of surgery case reports · 2022Article
- Long-term survival after distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection and hepatic artery reconstruction in the setting of locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Clinical significance of variant hepatic artery in pancreatic resection: A comprehensive review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Review
- Korean Surgical Practice Guideline for Pancreatic Cancer 2022: A summary of evidence-based surgical approachesAnnals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2022Article
- Laparoscopic radical distal pancreatosplenectomy with celiac axis excision following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2022Article
- Hepatic Arterial Variations and Its Implication During Pancreatic Cancer Surgeries.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2021Review
- Distal Pancreatectomy with Celiac Axis Resection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2021Review
- Preoperative CT predictors of survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma undergoing curative intent surgery.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2021Article
- Successful intragastric suture repair using endoscopy for refractory ischemic stomach perforation: A case report.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021Article
- [Radiologic Evaluation for Resectability of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma].Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe chi · 2021Review
- Spanish multicenter study of surgical resection of pancreatic tumors infiltrating the celiac axis: does the type of pancreatectomy affect results?Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021Observational
- The Current Treatment Paradigm for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Barriers to Therapeutic Efficacy.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: what is the true oncological benefit?Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac resection (DP-CAR) is used to treat locally advanced pancreatic cancer, the advantages and disadvantages of this surgical procedure remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate its clinical safety and efficacy.Studies regarding DP-CAR were retrieved from the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Chinese electronic databases. Articles were selected according to predesigned inclusion criteria, and data were extracted according to predesigned sheets. Clinical, oncologic, and survival outcomes of DP-CAR were systematically reviewed by hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratio (OR) using fixed- or random-effects models.Eighteen studies were included. DP-CAR had a longer operating time and greater intraoperative blood loss compared to distal pancreatectomy (DP). A high incidence of vascular reconstruction occurred in DP-CAR: 11.53% (95%CI: 6.88-18.68%) for artery and 33.28% (95%CI: 20.45-49.19%) for vein. The pooled R0 resection rate of DP-CAR was 72.79% (95% CI, 46.19-89.29%). Higher mortality and morbidity rates were seen in DP-CAR, but no significant differences were detected compared to DP; the pooled OR was 1.798 for mortality (95% CI, 0.360-8.989) and 2.106 for morbidity (95% CI, 0.828-5.353). The pooled incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) was 31.31% (95%CI, 23.69-40.12%) in DP-CAR, similar to that of DP (OR = 1.07; 95%CI, 0.52-2.20). The pooled HR against DP-CAR was 5.67 (95%CI, 1.48-21.75) for delayed gastric emptying. The pooled rate of reoperation was 9.74% (95%CI, 4.56-19.59%) in DP-CAR. The combined 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates in DP-CAR were 65.22% (49.32-78.34%), 30.20% (21.50-40. 60%), and 18.70% (10.89-30.13%), respectively. The estimated means and medians for survival time in DP-CAR patients were 24.12 (95%CI, 18.26-29.98) months and 17.00 (95%CI, 13.52-20.48) months, respectively. There were no significant differences regarding postoperative 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates between DP-CAR and DP, whereas DP-CAR had a better 1-year survival rate compared to palliative treatments. The pooled HR for overall survival between DP-CAR and DP was 1.36 (95%CI: 0.997-1.850); the pooled HR favoring DP-CAR was 0.38 (95%CI: 0.25-0.58) for overall survival compared to palliative treatments. The rate of cancer-related pain relief from DP-CAR was 89.20% (95%CI, 77.85-95.10%). The pooled incidence of postoperative diarrhea was 37.10% (95%CI, 20.79-57.00%); however, most diarrhea was effectively controlled.DP-CAR is feasible and acceptable in terms of its survival benefits and improved quality of life. However, it should be performed with caution due to its high postoperative morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.