Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26962768›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2016

Microbiological Assessment of Bile and Corresponding Antibiotic Treatment: A Strobe-Compliant Observational Study of 1401 Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiographies.

Christian Rupp, Konrad Bode, Karl Heinz Weiss, Gerda Rudolph, Janine Bergemann, Petra Kloeters-Plachky, Fadi Chahoud, Wolfgang Stremmel, Daniel Nils Gotthardt, Peter Sauer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05712733 (Cholecystitis From a Microbiological and Histopathological Perspective), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05712733 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Cholecystitis From a Microbiological and Histopathological Perspective

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorOrgankirurgisk afdeling, sygehus lillebælt, KoldingRan2023 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsCalculous Cholecystitis, Antibiotic Resistant Infection, Gallbladder InflammationArmsMicrobiological and histopathological investigation of bile and gallbladder wall specimens.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Biliary infection; distribution of species and antibiogram study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christian RuppFrom the Department of Gastroenterology, Toxicology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (CR, KHW, GR, JB, PK-P, FC, WS, DNG, PS) and Department of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene (KB), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Konrad Bode
Karl Heinz Weiss
Gerda Rudolph
Janine Bergemann
Petra Kloeters-Plachky
Fadi Chahoud
Wolfgang Stremmel
Daniel Nils Gotthardt
Peter Sauer
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the antibiotic susceptibility profiles of bacteria in bile samples and to analyze the clinical relevance of the findings as only limited information about risk factors for elevated frequence of bacterial and fungal strains in routinely collected bile samples has been described so far.A prospective cohort study at a tertiary care center was conducted. Seven hundred forty-four patients underwent 1401 endoscopic retrograde cholangiographies (ERCs) as indicated by liver transplantation (427/1401), primary sclerosing cholangitis (222/1401), choledocholithiasis only (153/1401), obstruction due to malignancy (366/1401), or other conditions (233/1401). Bile samples for microbiological analysis were obtained in all patients.The 71.6% (823/1150) samples had a positive microbiological finding, and 57% (840/1491) of the bacterial isolates were gram-positive. The main species were Enterococcus spp (33%; 494/1491) and Escherichia coli (12%; 179/1491). Of the samples, 53.8% had enteric bacteria and 24.7% had Candida spp; both were associated with clinical and laboratory signs of cholangitis (C-reactive proteins 35.0 ± 50.1 vs 44.8 ± 57.6; 34.5 ± 51.2 vs 52.9 ± 59.7; P < 0.001), age, previous endoscopic intervention, and immunosuppression. Multi-resistant (MR) strains were found in 11.3% of all samples and were associated with clinical and laboratory signs of cholangitis, previous intervention, and immunocompromised status. In subgroup analysis, strain-specific antibiotic therapy based on bile sampling was achieved in 56.3% (89/158) of the patients. In cases with a positive bile culture and available blood culture, blood cultures were positive in 29% of cases (36/124), and 94% (34/36) of blood cultures had microbial species identical to the bile cultures.Bactobilia and fungobilia can usually be detected by routine microbiological sampling, allowing optimized, strain-specific antibiotic treatment. Previous endoscopic intervention, clinical and laboratory signs of cholangitis, and age are independent risk factors. MR bacteria and fungi are an evolving problem in cholangitis, especially in immunocompromised patients.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBiliary Tract DiseasesCholangitisAdultAgedBacteriaBileCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCohort StudiesC-Reactive ProteinDrug Resistance, MicrobialFemaleGermanyHumansIncidenceMaleAnti-Bacterial AgentsC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID26962768
PMCPMC4998849
OpenAlexW2334605898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.