Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26962325›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2016

A simple test for the cleavage activity of customized endonucleases in plants.

Nagaveni Budhagatapalli, Sindy Schedel, Maia Gurushidze, Stefanie Pencs, Stefan Hiekel, Twan Rutten, Stefan Kusch, Robert Morbitzer, Thomas Lahaye, Ralph Panstruga and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Functional Validation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Mutation of theFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Biolistic Approach for Transient Gene Expression Studies in Plants.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nagaveni Budhagatapalli *Plant Reproductive Biology, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), Corrensstr. 3, 06466 Stadt Seeland/OT Gatersleben, Germany.
Sindy Schedel *Plant Reproductive Biology, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), Corrensstr. 3, 06466 Stadt Seeland/OT Gatersleben, Germany.
Maia GurushidzePlant Reproductive Biology, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), Corrensstr. 3, 06466 Stadt Seeland/OT Gatersleben, Germany.
Stefanie PencsPlant Reproductive Biology, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), Corrensstr. 3, 06466 Stadt Seeland/OT Gatersleben, Germany.
Stefan HiekelPlant Reproductive Biology, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), Corrensstr. 3, 06466 Stadt Seeland/OT Gatersleben, Germany.
Twan RuttenStructural Cell Biology, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), Corrensstr. 3, 06466 Stadt Seeland/OT Gatersleben, Germany.
Stefan KuschUnit of Plant Molecular Cell Biology, Institute for Biology I, RWTH Aachen University, Worringerweg 1, 52056 Aachen, Germany.
Robert MorbitzerZMBP-General Genetics, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 32, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Thomas LahayeZMBP-General Genetics, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 32, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Ralph PanstrugaUnit of Plant Molecular Cell Biology, Institute for Biology I, RWTH Aachen University, Worringerweg 1, 52056 Aachen, Germany.
Jochen KumlehnPlant Reproductive Biology, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), Corrensstr. 3, 06466 Stadt Seeland/OT Gatersleben, Germany.
Goetz HenselPlant Reproductive Biology, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), Corrensstr. 3, 06466 Stadt Seeland/OT Gatersleben, Germany.
Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research · DERWTH Aachen University · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough customized endonucleases [transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) and RNA-guided endonucleases (RGENs)] are known to be effective agents of mutagenesis in various host plants, newly designed endonuclease constructs require some pre-validation with respect to functionality before investing in the creation of stable transgenic plants.

resultsA simple, biolistics-based leaf epidermis transient expression test has been developed, based on reconstituting the translational reading frame of a mutated, non-functional yfp reporter gene. Quantification of mutation efficacy was made possible by co-bombarding the explant with a constitutive mCherry expression cassette, thereby allowing the ratio between the number of red and yellow fluorescing cells to serve as a metric for mutation efficiency. Challenging either stable mutant alleles of a compromised version of gfp in tobacco and barley or the barley MLO gene with TALENs/RGENs confirmed the capacity to induce site-directed mutations.

conclusionsA convenient procedure to assay the cleavage activity of customized endonucleases has been established. The system is independent of the endonuclease platform and operates in both di- and monocotyledonous hosts. It not only enables the validation of a TALEN/RGEN's functionality prior to the creation of stable mutants, but also serves as a suitable tool to optimize the design of endonuclease constructs.

Indexed as

Biolistic gene transferRNA-guided endonucleasesSite-directed mutagenesisTranscription activator-like effector nucleasesTransient expression

Identifiers

PMID26962325
PMCPMC4784412
OpenAlexW2294862495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.