Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26962078›Full record

Trial reportClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2016

Efficacy and Safety of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole Versus Meropenem in the Treatment of Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection: Results From a Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Program.

John E Mazuski, Leanne B Gasink, Jon Armstrong, Helen Broadhurst, Greg G Stone, Douglas Rank, Lily Llorens, Paul Newell, Jan Pachl

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 193 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
193citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
19.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01499290 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III, Randomized, Multicenter, Double Blind, Double-Dummy, Parallel-Group, Comparative Study to Determine the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Ceftazidime Avibactam Plus Metronidazole Versus Meropenem in the Treatment of Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections In Hospitalized Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorPfizerRan2012 to 2014Enrolled493ConditionsComplicated Intra-Abdominal InfectionArmsCAZ-AVI, Metronidazole, Meropenem
NCT01500239 no registry record found
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

193 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 378 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy of Ceftazidime-avibactam in treating Gram-negative infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. IGNITE4: Results of a Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Prospective Trial of Eravacycline vs Meropenem in the Treatment of Complicated Intraabdominal Infections.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2019
    Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2018
    Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

133 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

John E MazuskiWashington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Leanne B GasinkAstraZeneca, Wilmington, Delaware.
Jon ArmstrongAstraZeneca, Alderley Park, United Kingdom.
Helen BroadhurstAstraZeneca, Alderley Park, United Kingdom.
Greg G StoneAstraZeneca, Waltham, Massachusetts.
Douglas RankActavis,Oakland, California.
Lily LlorensActavis,Oakland, California.
Paul NewellAstraZeneca, Alderley Park, United Kingdom.
Jan PachlThe Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBAllergan (United States) · USAstraZeneca (United States) · USCharles University · CZWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhen combined with ceftazidime, the novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor avibactam provides a carbapenem alternative against multidrug-resistant infections. Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole were compared with meropenem in 1066 men and women with complicated intra-abdominal infections from 2 identical, randomized, double-blind phase 3 studies (NCT01499290 and NCT01500239).

methodsThe primary end point was clinical cure at test-of-cure visit 28-35 days after randomization, assessed by noninferiority of ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole to meropenem in the microbiologically modified intention-to-treat (mMITT) population (in accordance with US Food and Drug Administration guidance), and the modified intention-to-treat and clinically evaluable populations (European Medicines Agency guidance). Noninferiority was considered met if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for between-group difference was greater than the prespecified noninferiority margin of -12.5%.

resultsCeftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole was noninferior to meropenem across all primary analysis populations. Clinical cure rates with ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole and meropenem, respectively, were as follows: mMITT population, 81.6% and 85.1% (between-group difference, -3.5%; 95% confidence interval -8.64 to 1.58); modified intention-to-treat, 82.5% and 84.9% (-2.4%; -6.90 to 2.10); and clinically evaluable, 91.7% and 92.5% (-0.8%; -4.61 to 2.89). The clinical cure rate with ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole for ceftazidime-resistant infections was comparable to that with meropenem (mMITT population, 83.0% and 85.9%, respectively) and similar to the regimen's own efficacy against ceftazidime-susceptible infections (82.0%). Adverse events were similar between groups.

conclusionsCeftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole was noninferior to meropenem in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections. Efficacy was similar against infections caused by ceftazidime-susceptible and ceftazidime-resistant pathogens. The safety profile of ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole was consistent with that previously observed with ceftazidime alone. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01499290 and NCT01500239.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAzabicyclo CompoundsCeftazidimeMetronidazoleThienamycinsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDrug CombinationsFemaleHumansIntraabdominal InfectionsMaleMeropenemMiddle AgedAnti-Bacterial Agentsavibactam, ceftazidime drug combinationAzabicyclo CompoundsCeftazidimeDrug CombinationsMeropenemMetronidazoleThienamycinsceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazolecomplicated intra-abdominal infectionmeropenemnoninferiorityphase 3

Identifiers

PMID26962078
PMCPMC4872289
OpenAlexW2294833633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.