Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26962008›Full record

ArticleTransfusion medicine reviews2016

Blood-Borne Pathogens: A Canadian Blood Services Centre for Innovation Symposium.

Geraldine M Walsh, Andrew W Shih, Ziad Solh, Mia Golder, Peter Schubert, Margaret Fearon, William P Sheffield

Open access · greenAbstract readConference Proceedings
In one paragraph

Article in Transfusion medicine reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Occult Hepatitis Infection in Transfusion Medicine: Screening Policy and Assessment of Current Use of Anti-HBc Testing.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2017
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Geraldine M WalshCentre for Innovation, Canadian Blood Services, Hamilton, Ottawa, and Vancouver, Canada.
Andrew W ShihMedical Services and Innovation, Canadian Blood Services, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Ziad SolhMedical Services and Innovation, Canadian Blood Services, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Mia GolderCentre for Innovation, Canadian Blood Services, Hamilton, Ottawa, and Vancouver, Canada.
Peter SchubertCentre for Innovation, Canadian Blood Services, Hamilton, Ottawa, and Vancouver, Canada; Centre for Blood Research, University of British Columbia, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Canada.
Margaret FearonMedical Services and Innovation, Canadian Blood Services, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada.
William P SheffieldCentre for Innovation, Canadian Blood Services, Hamilton, Ottawa, and Vancouver, Canada; Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. Electronic address: sheffiel@mcmaster.ca.
Canadian Blood Services · CAMcMaster University Medical Centre · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Testing donations for pathogens and deferring selected blood donors have reduced the risk of transmission of known pathogens by transfusion to extremely low levels in most developed countries. Protecting the blood supply from emerging infectious threats remains a serious concern in the transfusion medicine community. Transfusion services can employ indirect measures such as surveillance, hemovigilance, and donor questioning (defense), protein-, or nucleic acid based direct testing (detection), or pathogen inactivation of blood products (destruction) as strategies to mitigate the risk of transmission-transmitted infection. In the North American context, emerging threats currently include dengue, chikungunya, and hepatitis E viruses, and Babesia protozoan parasites. The 2003 SARS and 2014 Ebola outbreaks illustrate the potential of epidemics unlikely to be transmitted by blood transfusion but disruptive to blood systems. Donor-free blood products such as ex vivo generated red blood cells offer a theoretical way to avoid transmission-transmitted infection risk, although biological, engineering, and manufacturing challenges must be overcome before this approach becomes practical. Similarly, next generation sequencing of all nucleic acid in a blood sample is currently possible but impractical for generalized screening. Pathogen inactivation systems are in use in different jurisdictions around the world, and are starting to gain regulatory approval in North America. Cost concerns make it likely that pathogen inactivation will be contemplated by blood operators through the lens of health economics and risk-based decision making, rather than in zero-risk paradigms previously embraced for transfusable products. Defense of the blood supply from infectious disease risk will continue to require innovative combinations of surveillance, detection, and pathogen avoidance or inactivation.

Indexed as

Blood-Borne PathogensBlood SafetyCanadaCell Culture TechniquesCells, CulturedCommunicable Disease ControlCommunicable Diseases, EmergingDisease OutbreaksDisease Transmission, InfectiousDonor SelectionEbolavirusErythrocytesHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaHumansRisk ManagementSequence AnalysisBlood-borne pathogensHealth economicsNext generation sequencingPathogen inactivationTransfusionTransfusion-transmitted infection

Identifiers

PMID26962008
PMCPMC7126603
OpenAlexW2280228198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.