Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26961982›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2016

Localization of Diagnostically Relevant Regions of Interest in Whole Slide Images: a Comparative Study.

Ezgi Mercan, Selim Aksoy, Linda G Shapiro, Donald L Weaver, Tad T Brunyé, Joann G Elmore

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Multiplex imaging in immuno-oncology.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Analysis of Regions of Interest and Distractor Regions in Breast Biopsy Images.... IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics. IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. MLCD: A Unified Software Package for Cancer Diagnosis.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Machine Learning Methods for Histopathological Image Analysis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ezgi MercanDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Paul G. Allen Center for Computing, University of Washington, 185 Stevens Way, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA. ezgi@cs.washington.edu.
Selim AksoyDepartment of Computer Engineering, Bilkent University, Bilkent, 06800, Ankara, Turkey.
Linda G ShapiroDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Paul G. Allen Center for Computing, University of Washington, 185 Stevens Way, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Donald L WeaverDepartment of Pathology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, 05405, USA.
Tad T BrunyéDepartment of Psychology, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
Joann G ElmoreDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.

Funding

Accuracy of Breast Pathology and the Impact of Double ReadingR01CA140560 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ELMORE, JOANN G, WEAVER, DONALD LEE · 2009 to 2013
$3.3M
Digital Pathology_Accuracy Viewing Behavior and Image CharacterizationR01CA172343 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SHAPIRO, LINDA, WEAVER, DONALD LEE · 2013 to 2017
$3.2M
Improving Accuracy &Outcomes of Breast Cancer ScreeningK05CA104699 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ELMORE, JOANN G · 2004 to 2014
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS K05 CA104699NCI NIH HHS R01 CA140560NCI NIH HHS R01 CA172343
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole slide digital imaging technology enables researchers to study pathologists' interpretive behavior as they view digital slides and gain new understanding of the diagnostic medical decision-making process. In this study, we propose a simple yet important analysis to extract diagnostically relevant regions of interest (ROIs) from tracking records using only pathologists' actions as they viewed biopsy specimens in the whole slide digital imaging format (zooming, panning, and fixating). We use these extracted regions in a visual bag-of-words model based on color and texture features to predict diagnostically relevant ROIs on whole slide images. Using a logistic regression classifier in a cross-validation setting on 240 digital breast biopsy slides and viewport tracking logs of three expert pathologists, we produce probability maps that show 74 % overlap with the actual regions at which pathologists looked. We compare different bag-of-words models by changing dictionary size, visual word definition (patches vs. superpixels), and training data (automatically extracted ROIs vs. manually marked ROIs). This study is a first step in understanding the scanning behaviors of pathologists and the underlying reasons for diagnostic errors.

Indexed as

PathologistsBiopsyBreastDecision MakingFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMammographyMedical ErrorsComputer visionDigital pathologyMedical image analysisRegion of interestWhole slide imaging

Identifiers

PMID26961982
PMCPMC4942394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.