Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26961883›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2016

Influence of internal migration on reproductive health in Myanmar: results from a recent cross-sectional survey.

May Sudhinaraset, Nadia Diamond-Smith, May Me Thet, Tin Aung

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

May SudhinarasetGlobal Health Group, Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94116, USA. May.Sudhinaraset@ucsf.edu.
Nadia Diamond-SmithGlobal Health Group, Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94116, USA. Nadia.Diamond-Smith@ucsf.edu.
May Me ThetPopulation Services International, Myanmar, No. 16, Shwe Gon Taing, Street 4, Yangon, Myanmar. mmthet@psimyanmar.org.
Tin AungPopulation Services International, Myanmar, No. 16, Shwe Gon Taing, Street 4, Yangon, Myanmar. taung@psimyanmar.org.
Myanmar Oxford Clinical Research Unit · MMGlobal Brain Health Institute · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal and reproductive health remains a significant public health issue in Myanmar. Little data exists on women's health issues, including social and demographic influences. While past studies have demonstrated rural/urban health disparities, an increasingly important population resulting from urban growth in Myanmar is the internal migrant population, individuals moving within the country for better job or educational opportunities. Past studies suggest that women make up more than half of internal migrants, yet there is a dearth of information on this new wave of migration, particularly on women's reproductive health issues. The objective of this study is to assess the influence of women's migration in Myanmar on reproductive health outcomes, including delivering in a facility, using a skilled birth attendant, and using a modern method of family planning.

methodsData from a cross-sectional household survey using multistage cluster sampling design conducted between September to October 2014 was used to assess the accessibility and the use of maternal and child health products and services. A total of 1800 currently married women of reproductive age, including 348 from urban and 1452 from rural areas, were recruited to complete surveys. A set of multivariable regressions was performed to assess reproductive health outcomes and predictors.

resultsAcross health indicators, female migrants had better health outcomes compared to non-migrants. Controlling for demographic characteristics, migrants were 1.60 times more likely to use a modern form of family planning compared to non-migrants (p < 0.01) and use antenatal care during pregnancy (p < 0.05). While not statistically significant, migrants were 1.29 times more likely to deliver with a skilled attendant and 1.08 times more likely to deliver in a facility.

conclusionsThis study found that female migrants in Myanmar reported better health outcomes compared to non-migrant women in regards to family planning and maternal health. Future research should focus on monitoring the outcomes of migrants and their children over time to assess long-term impacts.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery, ObstetricFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansMiddle AgedMyanmarPregnancyPrenatal CareReproductive HealthTransients and MigrantsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26961883
PMCPMC4784279
OpenAlexW2295669967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.