Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26961772›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2016

The brain tissue response to surgical injury and its possible contribution to glioma recurrence.

Lauriane Hamard, David Ratel, Laurent Selek, François Berger, Boudewijn van der Sanden, Didier Wion

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Inhibiting glioma cell invasion by sequential photo-sonodynamic therapy.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Cell-free DNA-based liquid biopsies in neurology.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lauriane HamardINSERM UA 01, Clinatec, Centre de recherche biomédicale Edmond J. Safra, CEA 17 rue des Martyrs, 38054, Grenoble cedex, France.
David RatelClinatec, CEA Leti, Grenoble, France.
Laurent SelekINSERM UA 01, Clinatec, Centre de recherche biomédicale Edmond J. Safra, CEA 17 rue des Martyrs, 38054, Grenoble cedex, France.
François BergerINSERM UA 01, Clinatec, Centre de recherche biomédicale Edmond J. Safra, CEA 17 rue des Martyrs, 38054, Grenoble cedex, France.
Boudewijn van der SandenINSERM UA 01, Clinatec, Centre de recherche biomédicale Edmond J. Safra, CEA 17 rue des Martyrs, 38054, Grenoble cedex, France.
Didier WionINSERM UA 01, Clinatec, Centre de recherche biomédicale Edmond J. Safra, CEA 17 rue des Martyrs, 38054, Grenoble cedex, France. didier.wion@ujf-grenoble.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-7144-6470

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgery is the first line therapy for glioma. However, glioma recurs in 90 % of the patients in the resection margin. The impact of surgical brain injury (SBI) on glioma recurrence is largely overlooked. Herein, we review some of the mechanisms involved in tissue repair that may impact glioma recurrence at the resection margin. Many processes or molecules involved in tissue repair after brain injury are also critical for glioma growth. They include a wide array of secreted growth factors, cytokines and transcription factors including NFКB and STAT3 which in turn activate proliferative and anti-apoptotic genes and processes such as angiogenesis and inflammation. Because some residual glioma cells always remain in the tumor resection margin, there are now compelling arguments to suggest that some aspects of the brain tissue response to SBI can also participate to glioma recurrence at the resection margin. Brain tissue response to SBI recruits angiogenesis and inflammation that precede and then follow tumor recurrence at the resection margin. The healing response to SBI is double edged, as inflammation is involved in regeneration and healing, and has both pro- and anti-tumorigenic functions. A promising therapeutic approach is to normalize and re-educate the molecular and cellular responses at the resection margin to promote anti-tumorigenic processes involved in healing while inhibiting pro-tumorigenic activities. Manipulation of the inflammatory response to SBI to prevent local recurrence could also enhance the efficacy of other therapies such as immunotherapy. However, our current knowledge is far from sufficient to achieve this goal. Acknowledging, understanding and manipulating the double-edged role played by SBI in glioma recurrence is surely challenging, but it cannot be longer delayed.

Indexed as

BrainBrain NeoplasmsGliomaHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeurosurgical ProceduresDormancyGliomaInflammationMicroenvironmentSurgeryWound healing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.