Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26961771›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2016

Long-term results of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with CyberKnife for growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma: evaluation by the Cortina consensus.

Hiromitsu Iwata, Kengo Sato, Ryutaro Nomura, Yusuke Tabei, Ichiro Suzuki, Naoki Yokota, Mitsuhiro Inoue, Seiji Ohta, Shozo Yamada, Yuta Shibamoto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Reirradiation of recurrent brain tumors: a review by the ESTRO CNS Focus Group.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2027
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Hiromitsu IwataDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, 1-1-1, Hirate-cho, Kita-ku, Nagoya, 462-8508, Japan. h-iwa-ncu@nifty.com.
Kengo SatoDepartment of Neurosurgery, CyberKnife Center, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryutaro NomuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, CyberKnife Center, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Yusuke TabeiDepartment of Neurosurgery, CyberKnife Center, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Ichiro SuzukiDepartment of Neurosurgery, CyberKnife Center, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Naoki YokotaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yokohama CyberKnife Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Mitsuhiro InoueDivision of Quality Management with Radiotherapy, Yokohama CyberKnife Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Seiji OhtaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yokohama CyberKnife Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Shozo YamadaDepartment of Hypothalamic and Pituitary Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuta ShibamotoDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Japanese Red Cross Medical Center · JPChugoku Central Hospital · JPNagoya City University · JPNagoya Medical Center · JPToranomon Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) with CyberKnife for growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma (GH-PA). Fifty-two patients with GH-PA were treated with hypofractionated SRT between September 2001 and October 2012. Eight patients had clinically silent GH-PA and 44 were symptomatic. Only 1 patient was inoperable. The other patients had recurrent or postoperative residual tumors on MRI. All patients had received pharmacotherapy prior to SRT with a somatostatin analog, dopamine agonist, and/or GH receptor antagonist. The marginal doses were 17.4-26.8 Gy for the 3-fraction schedule and 20.0-32.0 Gy for the 5-fraction schedule. Endocrinological remission was assessed by the Cortina consensus criteria 2010 (random GH <1 ng/ml or nadir GH after an oral glucose tolerance test <0.4 ng/ml and normalization of age- and sex-adjusted insulin-like growth factor-1). The median follow-up period was 60 months (range 27-137). The 5-year overall survival, local control, and disease-free survival rates were 100, 100, and 96 %, respectively. Nine patients (5 clinically silent and 4 symptomatic patients) satisfied the Cortina criteria without receiving further pharmacotherapy, whereas the remaining 43 patients did not. No post-SRT grade 2 or higher visual disorder occurred. Symptomatic post-SRT hypopituitarism was observed in 1 patient. CyberKnife hypofractionated SRT is safe and effective when judged by imaging findings for GH-PA. However, it may be difficult to satisfy the Cortina consensus criteria in most symptomatic patients with SRT alone. Further investigations of optimal treatments are warranted.

Indexed as

RadiosurgeryAdenomaAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGrowth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary AdenomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRadiotherapy DosageSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultCortina consensusCyberKnifeGrowth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomaHypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapyOptic pathway

Identifiers

PMID26961771
OpenAlexW2295900138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.