Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26961700›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental health : a global access science source2016

Health and climate related ecosystem services provided by street trees in the urban environment.

Jennifer A Salmond, Marc Tadaki, Sotiris Vardoulakis, Katherine Arbuthnott, Andrew Coutts, Matthias Demuzere, Kim N Dirks, Clare Heaviside, Shanon Lim, Helen Macintyre and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental health : a global access science source, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Beyond redlining: Gentrification, displacement, disadvantages, and exclusivity predict urban environmental and health inequities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Insects · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Prioritizing urban heat adaptation infrastructure based on multiple outcomes: Comfort, health, and energy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Manhattan's Street Trees: An Unfinished Public Health Story.American journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jennifer A SalmondSchool of Environment, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand. j.salmond@auckland.ac.nz.
Marc TadakiDepartment of Geography, University of British Columbia, 1984 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z2, Canada. marc.tadaki@geog.ubc.ca.
Sotiris VardoulakisCentre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Public Health England, Chilton, OX11 0RQ, UK. sotiris.vardoulakis@phe.gov.uk.
Katherine ArbuthnottCentre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Public Health England, Chilton, OX11 0RQ, UK. Katherine.arbuthnott@lshtm.ac.uk.
Andrew CouttsSchool of Earth, Atmosphere and Environment, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3800, Australia. andrew.coutts@monash.edu.
Matthias DemuzereSchool of Earth, Atmosphere and Environment, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3800, Australia. matthias.demuzere@ees.kuleuven.be.
Kim N DirksSchool of Population Health, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand. k.dirks@auckland.ac.nz.
Clare HeavisideCentre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Public Health England, Chilton, OX11 0RQ, UK. clare.heaviside@phe.gov.uk.
Shanon LimSchool of Environment, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.
Helen MacintyreCentre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Public Health England, Chilton, OX11 0RQ, UK. helen.macintyre@phe.gov.uk.
Rachel N McInnesEuropean Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Knowledge Spa, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, Cornwall, TR1 3HD, UK. rachel.mcinnes@metoffice.gov.uk.
Benedict W WheelerEuropean Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Knowledge Spa, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, Cornwall, TR1 3HD, UK. b.w.wheeler@exeter.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban tree planting initiatives are being actively promoted as a planning tool to enable urban areas to adapt to and mitigate against climate change, enhance urban sustainability and improve human health and well-being. However, opportunities for creating new areas of green space within cities are often limited and tree planting initiatives may be constrained to kerbside locations. At this scale, the net impact of trees on human health and the local environment is less clear, and generalised approaches for evaluating their impact are not well developed.In this review, we use an urban ecosystems services framework to evaluate the direct, and locally-generated, ecosystems services and disservices provided by street trees. We focus our review on the services of major importance to human health and well-being which include 'climate regulation', 'air quality regulation' and 'aesthetics and cultural services'. These are themes that are commonly used to justify new street tree or street tree retention initiatives. We argue that current scientific understanding of the impact of street trees on human health and the urban environment has been limited by predominantly regional-scale reductionist approaches which consider vegetation generally and/or single out individual services or impacts without considering the wider synergistic impacts of street trees on urban ecosystems. This can lead planners and policymakers towards decision making based on single parameter optimisation strategies which may be problematic when a single intervention offers different outcomes and has multiple effects and potential trade-offs in different places.We suggest that a holistic approach is required to evaluate the services and disservices provided by street trees at different scales. We provide information to guide decision makers and planners in their attempts to evaluate the value of vegetation in their local setting. We show that by ensuring that the specific aim of the intervention, the scale of the desired biophysical effect and an awareness of a range of impacts guide the choice of i) tree species, ii) location and iii) density of tree placement, street trees can be an important tool for urban planners and designers in developing resilient and resourceful cities in an era of climatic change.

Indexed as

City PlanningEnvironmental HealthPublic HealthTreesUrban HealthAir PollutionCitiesHumans

Identifiers

PMID26961700
PMCPMC4895605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.