Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26961536›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2016

Signal of Gastrointestinal Congenital Malformations with Antipsychotics After Minimising Competition Bias: A Disproportionality Analysis Using Data from Vigibase(®).

François Montastruc, Francesco Salvo, Mickaël Arnaud, Bernard Bégaud, Antoine Pariente

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Use of Antipsychotic Drugs During Pregnancy.Current treatment options in psychiatry · 2019
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

François MontastrucINSERM, U1219-Pharmacoepidemiology, Université de Bordeaux, 33000, Bordeaux, France. francois.montastruc@univ-tlse3.fr.
Francesco SalvoINSERM, U1219-Pharmacoepidemiology, Université de Bordeaux, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
Mickaël ArnaudINSERM, U1219-Pharmacoepidemiology, Université de Bordeaux, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
Bernard BégaudINSERM, U1219-Pharmacoepidemiology, Université de Bordeaux, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
Antoine ParienteINSERM, U1219-Pharmacoepidemiology, Université de Bordeaux, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
French Clinical Research Infrastructure Network · FRUniversité de Bordeaux · FRBordeaux Population Health · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInvestigations have highlighted the lack of evidence regarding the likelihood of congenital malformations following exposure to antipsychotic drugs during pregnancy. To gain further knowledge regarding their safety, we evaluated signals of congenital malformations with antipsychotics using VigiBase(®), the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Individual Case Safety Report (ICSR) database.

methodA case/non-case study was conducted in VigiBase(®) between 1967 and 2014. Signals of disproportionate reporting (SDRs) were detected using the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), which defines SDRs as drug-report associations with a PRR ≥2, Chi square ≥4, and number of cases ≥3. SDR detection for antipsychotics was performed for congenital malformations after removing all reports related to drug competitors and reports of movement disorders from the database.

resultsAfter removing reports related to drug competitors (antiepileptics, antidepressants, antivirals) and movement disorders, three signals were revealed: 'palate disorders congenital' (PRR 2.1, 95 % CI 1.6-2.9, Chi square = 30; n = 41), 'oesophageal disorders congenital' (PRR 2.5, 95 % CI 1.3-4.7, Chi square = 11; n = 10) and 'anorectal disorders congenital' (PRR 3.0, 95 % CI 1.6-5.6, Chi square = 13; n = 11). Among antipsychotics, phenothiazines with a piperazine side-chain, risperidone and aripiprazole appeared to be more suspect.

conclusionConfirming a first signal from spontaneous reporting data, three SDRs for antipsychotics and gastrointestinal congenital abnormalities were unmasked in VigiBase(®). This signal should be further explored by ad hoc pharmacoepidemiologic studies in order to assess whether it is relevant for prescription and public health.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAntipsychotic AgentsBiasCase-Control StudiesDatabases, PharmaceuticalDigestive System AbnormalitiesHumansPharmacovigilanceAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID26961536
OpenAlexW2293242148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.