Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26961288›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of pediatrics : WJP2016

The etiology of congenital nephrotic syndrome: current status and challenges.

Jing-Jing Wang, Jian-Hua Mao

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of pediatrics : WJP, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Role of p.Ser1105Ser (inMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2019
    Article
  18. Genetics of congenital and infantile nephrotic syndrome.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2019
    Article
  19. Diagnostic and Management Challenges in Congenital Nephrotic Syndrome.Pediatric health, medicine and therapeutics · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jing-Jing WangDepartment of Nephrology, Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Jian-Hua MaoDepartment of Nephrology, Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China. maojh88@126.com.
Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCongenital nephrotic syndrome (CNS), defined as heavy proteinuria, hypoalbuminemia, hyperlipidemia and edema presenting in the first 0-3 months of life, may be caused by congenital syphilis, toxoplasmosis, or congenital viral infections (such as cytomegalovirus). However, the majority of CNS cases are caused by monogenic defects of structural proteins that form the glomerular filtration barrier in the kidneys. Since 1998, an increasing number of genetic defects have been identified for their involvements in the pathogenesis of CNS, including NPHS1, NPHS2, WT1, PLCE1, and LAMB2. DATA SOURCES: We searched databases such as PubMed, Elsevier and Wanfang with the following key words: congenital nephrotic syndrome, proteinuria, infants, neonate, congenital infection, mechanism and treatment; and we selected those publications written in English that we judged to be relevant to the topic of this review.

resultsBased on the data present in the literature, we reviewed the following topics: 1) Infection associated CNS including congenital syphilis, congenital toxoplasmosis, and congenital cytomegalovirus infection; 2) genetic CNS including mutation of NPHS1 (Nephrin), NPHS2 (Podocin), WT1, LAMB2 (Laminin-β2), PLCE1 (NPHS3); 3) Other forms of CNS including maternal systemic lupus erythematosus, mercury poisoning, renal vein thrombosis, neonatal alloimmunization against neutral endopeptidase.

conclusionAt present, the main challenge in CNS is to identify the cause of disease for individual patients. To make a definitive diagnosis, with the exclusion of infection-related CNS and maternal-associated disorders, pathology, family history, inheritance mode, and other accompanying congenital malformations are sometimes, but not always, useful indicators for diagnosing genetic CNS. Next-generation sequencing would be a more effective method for diagnosing genetic CNS in some patients, however, there are still some challenges with next-generation sequencing that need to be resolved in the future.

Indexed as

HumansInfantInfant, NewbornNephrotic Syndromecongenital infectioncongenital nephrotic syndromemono-genetic mutationnext-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID26961288
OpenAlexW2299662273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.