Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26961228›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2016

[Modern imaging of renal tumors - application in diagnostics and therapy. Characterization, operation planning and therapy monitoring of renal lesions].

J P Radtke, D Teber, C D Alt, B A Hadaschik, P Hallscheidt

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J P RadtkeUrologische Universitätsklinik Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland. j.radtke@dkfz-heidelberg.de.
D TeberUrologische Universitätsklinik Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
C D AltDiagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
B A HadaschikUrologische Universitätsklinik Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
P HallscheidtRadiologie Darmstadt, Alice-Hospital, Darmstadt, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article elucidates the various tools used for the diagnostics and characterization of renal lesions. The advantages and limitations of ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are presented and discussed. In addition, modern imaging features of CT and MRI, such as iodine quantification in CT as well as diffusion-weighted and perfusion imaging in MRI are presented. Lastly, recent developments in standardized reporting of renal tumors regarding the intraoperative surgical risk are presented.

Indexed as

HumansImage EnhancementKidney NeoplasmsPreoperative CarePrognosisSurgery, Computer-AssistedTreatment OutcomeComputed tomographyKidney neoplasmsMagnetic resonance imagingRadiologyUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID26961228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.