Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26961193›Full record

SynthesisInternational orthopaedics2016

Bone morphogenetic protein use in spine surgery-complications and outcomes: a systematic review.

Antonio Faundez, Clément Tournier, Matthieu Garcia, Stéphane Aunoble, Jean-Charles Le Huec

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International orthopaedics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Does type of bone graft matter? A retrospective review of the use of biological bone grafts in patients undergoing elective 1-3 level spinal interbody fusion.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Antonio FaundezHôpital Universitaire de Genève, Rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland.
Clément TournierUniversité Bordeaux, Orthospine Department 2, 146 rue Leo Saignat, 33076, Bordeaux Cedex, France.
Matthieu GarciaUniversité Bordeaux, Orthospine Department 2, 146 rue Leo Saignat, 33076, Bordeaux Cedex, France.
Stéphane AunobleUniversité Bordeaux, Orthospine Department 2, 146 rue Leo Saignat, 33076, Bordeaux Cedex, France.
Jean-Charles Le HuecUniversité Bordeaux, Orthospine Department 2, 146 rue Leo Saignat, 33076, Bordeaux Cedex, France. j-c.lehuec@u-bordeaux2.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBecause of significant complications related to the use of autologous bone grafts in spinal fusion surgery, bone substitutes and growth factors such as bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) have been developed. One of them, recombinant human (rh) BMP-2, has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use under precise conditions. However, rhBMP-2-related side effects have been reported, used in FDA-approved procedures, but also in off-label use.A systematic review of clinical data was conducted to analyse the rhBMP-2-related adverse events (AEs), in order to assess their prevalence and the associated surgery practices.

methodsMedline search with keywords "bone morphogenetic protein 2", "lumbar spine", "anterolateral interbody fusion" (ALIF) and the filter "clinical trial". FDA published reports were also included. Study assessment was made by authors (experienced spine surgeons), based on quality of study designs and level of evidence.

resultsExtensive review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled series published up to the present point, reveal no evidence of a significant increase of AEs related to rhBMP-2 use during ALIF surgeries, provided that it is used following FDA guidelines. Two additional RCTs performed with rhBMP-2 in combination with allogenic bone dowels reported increased bone remodelling in BMP-treated patients. This AE was transient and had no consequence on the clinical outcome of the patients. No other BMP-related AEs were reported in these studies.

conclusionsThis literature review confirms that the use of rhBMP-2 following FDA-approved recommendations (i.e. one-level ALIF surgery with an LT-cage) is safe. The rate of complications is low and the AEs had been identified by the FDA during the pre-marketing clinical trials. The clinical efficiency of rhBMP-2 is equal or superior to that of allogenic or autologous bone graft in respect to fusion rate, low back pain disability, patient satisfaction and rate of re-operations. For all other off-label use, the safety and effectiveness of rhBMP-2 have not been established, and further RCTs with high level of evidence are required.

Indexed as

AdultBone Morphogenetic Protein 2Bone TransplantationFemaleHumansLow Back PainLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedOff-Label UsePostoperative ComplicationsRecombinant ProteinsSpinal FusionTransforming Growth Factor betaBone Morphogenetic Protein 2recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2Recombinant ProteinsTransforming Growth Factor betaAdverse effectsBone morphogenetic proteinOsteoinductionSpinal fusion

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.