Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26960687›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2017

Analyzing Proportion Scores as Outcomes for Prevention Trials: a Statistical Primer.

Kehui Chen, Yu Cheng, Olga Berkout, Oliver Lindhiem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Treatment Effects of a Primary Care Intervention on Parenting Behaviors: Sometimes It's Relative.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2017
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Older Drivers Reduced Engagement in Distracting Behaviors Over a Six-Year Period: Findings From the Candrive Longitudinal Study.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Three decades of demographic trends among academic emergency physicians.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kehui ChenDepartment of Statistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Yu ChengDepartment of Statistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Olga BerkoutDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Oliver LindhiemDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. lindhiemoj@upmc.edu.

Funding

CLINICAL RESEARCH TRAINING IN CHILD PSYCHIATRYT32MH018951 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI TINA R GOLDSTEIN · 1990 to 2026
$9.7M
TREATING BEHAVIOR PROBLEMS IN PRIMARY CARER01MH063272 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KOLKO, DAVID · 2000 to 2012
$5.7M
Skill Acquisition/Utilization During Treatment for Childhood Behavior ProblemsK01MH093508 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI LINDHIEM, OLIVER JAMES · 2011 to 2015
$689k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH093508NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH063272NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH018951
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In prevention trials, outcomes of interest frequently include data that are best quantified as proportion scores. In some cases, however, proportion scores may violate the statistical assumptions underlying common analytic methods. In this paper, we provide guidelines for analyzing frequency and proportion data as primary outcomes. We describe standard methods including generalized linear regression models to compare mean proportion scores and examine tools for testing normality and other assumptions for each model. Recommendations are made for instances when the assumptions are not met, including transformations for proportion scores that are non-normal. We also discuss more sophisticated analytical tools to model change in proportion scores over time. The guidelines provide ready-to-use analytical strategies for frequency and proportion data that are commonly encountered in prevention science.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicPreventive MedicineHumansLinear ModelsOutcome Assessment, Health CareBeta regressionData transformationsGeneralized linear modelsPrevention trialsProportion scores

Identifiers

PMID26960687
PMCPMC5860877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.