ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2016
[Endoscopic therapy for gastroduodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms].
Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN): update on endoscopic and surgical management].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided transperineal core-needle biopsy versus endoscopic forceps biopsy in the diagnosis of complex rectal lesions.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- [A rare subtype of duodenal neuroendocrine tumors].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021Article
- Relevant risk factors and the prognostic impact of positive resection margins after endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) represent a group of potentially malignant tumors, which can be located in every section of the gastrointestinal tract, the pancreas and the bronchopulmonary system. Gastroduodenal NENs have a relatively good prognosis in comparison to other subentities, e.g. pancreatic or ileojejunal NENs. In the stomach there are four different types of NENs, while in the duodenum there are five types and all vary in the malignant potential and the therapeutic approach. Due to the simple access endoscopic methods not only have diagnostic but also important therapeutic relevance in this subgroup. Lesions smaller than 1 cm can easily be resected with forceps or snare resection and for larger lesions up to 2 cm more invasive strategies, such as endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are available. Important criteria in gastric NEN for the risk evaluation of endoscopic treatment alone are the size of the lesion, depth of invasion and the tumor biology, e.g. neuroendocrine tumor (NET) G1/G2 versus neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) G3. In duodenal NEN the aforementioned risk factors also apply and in addition only lesions outside the ampulla of Vater should be endoscopically resected whereas periampullary lesions need to be addressed surgically. As an individualized therapeutic approach the possibility of a combined endoscopic and laparoscopic resection technique exists. Follow-up endoscopic investigations are necessary, especially in gastric type 1 NENs, which have a tendency to relapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26960437What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.