Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26960428›Full record

ArticleJournal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine2016

Factors Associated with Productive Recruiting in a Respondent-Driven Sample of Men who Have Sex with Men in Vancouver, Canada.

Jamie I Forrest, Nathan J Lachowsky, Allan Lal, Zishan Cui, Paul Sereda, Henry F Raymond, Gina Ogilvie, Eric A Roth, David Moore, Robert S Hogg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jamie I ForrestFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. jamie.forrest@alumni.ubc.ca.
Nathan J LachowskyFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Allan LalBritish Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, Canada.
Zishan CuiBritish Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, Canada.
Paul SeredaBritish Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, Canada.
Henry F RaymondSan Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, USA.
Gina OgilvieFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Eric A RothDepartment of Anthropology, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada.
David MooreFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Robert S HoggBritish Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, Canada.

Funding

HAART optimism, drug use and risky sexual behavior among MSM in British Columbia.R01DA031055 · NIDA · SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY · PI HOGG, ROBERT S · 2011 to 2015
$2.0M
Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP-107544NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA031055NIDA NIH HHS R01DA031055-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) has become a preferred sampling strategy for HIV research and surveillance in many global settings. Methodological investigation into the validity of RDS-generated samples has helped improve theoretical components of design. However, the operational challenges of implementing RDS remain underreported. We sought to identify factors independently associated with productive recruiting in an urban RDS-generated sample of gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM). Data were collected from the Momentum Health Study, a cohort of MSM recruited by RDS in Vancouver, Canada. Eligible men were given up to six RDS coupons to recruit their peers. The primary outcome was a count variable of each participant's number of eligible recruits. Multivariable Poisson regression identified independent predictors of productive recruitment. In total, 719 individuals comprised this analysis, of which 119 were seeds. The distribution of eligible recruits was right skewed, with 391 (54.4 %) having never recruited another participant and only eight participants (1.1 %) having recruited five. Significant, independent predictors of recruiting one additional participant included network size per ten unit increase (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 1.03), being of Aboriginal race/ethnicity compared with White (aRR 1.51), being HIV-positive (aRR 1.31), being sexually active with only males (aRR 2.48), being single compared with common law/married (aRR 1.37), having recently read gay newspapers (aRR 1.58), having recently sought sex partners online (aRR 1.33) and being out to a male parent (aRR 1.30). This analysis demonstrates the importance of social network size in RDS adjustment, but also identifies other socio-demographic and behavioral variables that increased RDS coupon return, which may help researchers better operationalize the implementation of RDS.

Indexed as

Homosexuality, MalePatient SelectionAdultBritish ColumbiaHumansMaleMiddle AgedSampling StudiesSexual and Gender MinoritiesGay and bisexual menHIVMSMRDSRecruitmentRespondent-driven sampling

Identifiers

PMID26960428
PMCPMC4835350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.