Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26960327›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2016

Anopheles farauti is a homogeneous population that blood feeds early and outdoors in the Solomon Islands.

Tanya L Russell, Nigel W Beebe, Hugo Bugoro, Allan Apairamo, Frank H Collins, Robert D Cooper, Neil F Lobo, Thomas R Burkot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. The diversity ofF1000Research · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tanya L RussellAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD, 4870, Australia. tanya.russell@jcu.edu.au.
Nigel W BeebeSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, 4068, Australia. n.beebe@uq.edu.au.
Hugo BugoroNational Vector Borne Disease Control Programme, Ministry of Health, Honiara, Solomon Islands. hugo.bugoro@sig.gov.sb.
Allan ApairamoNational Vector Borne Disease Control Programme, Ministry of Health, Honiara, Solomon Islands. allan.apairmo@gmail.com.
Frank H CollinsDepartment of Biological Sciences, Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA. frank@nd.edu.
Robert D CooperAustralian Army Malaria Institute, Gallipoli Barracks, Enoggera, 4052, Australia. Bob.Cooper@defence.gov.au.
Neil F LoboDepartment of Biological Sciences, Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA. nlobo@nd.edu.
Thomas R BurkotAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD, 4870, Australia. tom.burkot@jcu.edu.au.

Funding

TransmissionU19AI089686 · NIAID · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KAZURA, JAMES WALTER · 2010 to 2016
$9.9M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI089686NIAID NIH HHS U19AI08986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the 1970s, Anopheles farauti in the Solomon Island responded to indoor residual spraying with DDT by increasingly feeding more outdoors and earlier in the evening. Although long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are now the primary malaria vector control intervention in the Solomon Islands, only a small proportion of An. farauti still seek blood meals indoors and late at night where they are vulnerable to being killed by contract with the insecticides in LLINs. The effectiveness of LLINs and indoor residual spraying (IRS) in controlling malaria transmission where the vectors are exophagic and early biting will depend on whether the predominant outdoor or early biting phenotypes are associated with a subpopulation of the vectors present.

methodsMark-release-recapture experiments were conducted in the Solomon Islands to determine if individual An. farauti repeat the same behaviours over successive feeding cycles. The two behavioural phenotypes examined were those on which the WHO recommended malaria vector control strategies, LLINs and IRS, depend: indoor and late night biting.

resultsEvidence was found for An. farauti being a single population regarding time (early evening or late night) and location (indoor or outdoor) of blood feeding. Individual An. farauti did not consistently repeat behavioural phenotypes expressed for blood feeding (e.g., while most mosquitoes that fed early and outdoors, and would repeat those behaviours, some fed late at night or indoors in the next feeding cycle).

conclusionsThe finding that An. farauti is a homogeneous population is significant, because during the multiple feeding cycles required to complete the extrinsic incubation period, many individual female anophelines will enter houses late at night and be exposed to the insecticides used in LLINs or IRS. This explains, in part, the control that LLINs and IRS have exerted against a predominantly outdoor feeding vector, such as An. farauti. These findings may be relevant to many of the outdoor feeding vectors that dominate transmission in much of the malaria endemic world and justifies continued use of LLINs. However, the population-level tendency of mosquitoes to feed outdoors and early in the evening does require complementary interventions to accelerate malaria control towards elimination.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnophelesBiological AssayFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansMelanesia

Identifiers

PMID26960327
PMCPMC4784415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.