Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26960134›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Acellularization-Induced Changes in Tensile Properties Are Organ Specific - An In-Vitro Mechanical and Structural Analysis of Porcine Soft Tissues.

Stefan Schleifenbaum, Torsten Prietzel, Gabriela Aust, Andreas Boldt, Sebastian Fritsch, Isabel Keil, Holger Koch, Robert Möbius, Holger A Scheidt, Martin F X Wagner and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Decellularization of the human urethra for tissue engineering applications.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefan SchleifenbaumDepartment of Orthopedic, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Germany.
Torsten PrietzelDepartment of Orthopedic, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Germany.
Gabriela AustDepartment of Surgery, Research Laboratories, University of Leipzig, Germany.
Andreas BoldtInstitute of Clinical Immunology, University of Leipzig, Germany.
Sebastian FritschInstitute of Materials Science and Engineering, Technische Universität Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany.
Isabel KeilInstitute of Materials Science and Engineering, Technische Universität Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany.
Holger KochTranslational Centre for Regenerative Medicine (TRM), Leipzig, Germany.
Robert MöbiusInstitute of Anatomy, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Holger A ScheidtInstitute for Medical Physics and Biophysics, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Martin F X WagnerInstitute of Materials Science and Engineering, Technische Universität Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany.
Niels HammerDepartment of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Leipzig University · DEChemnitz University of Technology · DEUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThough xenogeneic acellular scaffolds are frequently used for surgical reconstruction, knowledge of their mechanical properties is lacking. This study compared the mechanical, histological and ultrastructural properties of various native and acellular specimens. MATERIALS AND

methodsPorcine esophagi, ureters and skin were tested mechanically in a native or acellular condition, focusing on the elastic modulus, ultimate tensile stress and maximum strain. The testing protocol for soft tissues was standardized, including the adaption of the tissue's water content and partial plastination to minimize material slippage as well as templates for normed sample dimensions and precise cross-section measurements. The native and acellular tissues were compared at the microscopic and ultrastructural level with a focus on type I collagens.

resultsIncreased elastic modulus and ultimate tensile stress values were quantified in acellular esophagi and ureters compared to the native condition. In contrast, these values were strongly decreased in the skin after acellularization. Acellularization-related decreases in maximum strain were found in all tissues. Type I collagens were well-preserved in these samples; however, clotting and a loss of cross-linking type I collagens was observed ultrastructurally. Elastins and fibronectins were preserved in the esophagi and ureters. A loss of the epidermal layer and decreased fibronectin content was present in the skin. DISCUSSION: Acellularization induces changes in the tensile properties of soft tissues. Some of these changes appear to be organ specific. Loss of cross-linking type I collagen may indicate increased mechanical strength due to decreasing transverse forces acting upon the scaffolds, whereas fibronectin loss may be related to decreased load-bearing capacity. Potentially, the alterations in tissue mechanics are linked to organ function and to the interplay of cells and the extracellular matrix, which is different in hollow organs when compared to skin.

Indexed as

AnimalsCollagen Type IElastic ModulusExtracellular MatrixSwineTensile StrengthCollagen Type I

Identifiers

PMID26960134
PMCPMC4784745
OpenAlexW2301088222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.